Browse Comments

AI search didn’t just scale Peter it rewired the sequence of how decisions form. When nearly a billion people interact with AI weekly, the “answer layer” becomes the first psychological touch point, not the website, not the brand, not the funnel. What you’re calling AI Answer BiasTM is real: cognitive ease, authority shortcuts, and uncertainty reduction all collapse into a single synthesized resp…

Congratulations Demis! We’re working on a new AI cognition model that represents a genuine breakthrough—a direction that has never been explored before. If you’re curious about these unique concepts, you can find the full explanation on my profile. Here are some details: I have mapped the relocation and interaction of components across the following vital systems (listing only the most critical h…

This is explored in my new book on Artificial Intelligence - AIlienMinds summary Optimists foretell a golden age of Al-managed abundance. Doomers cry: vast cyber-minds will crush old style humanity! ... or make us irrelevant. Meanwhile, geniuses fostering the artificial intelligence boom clutch clichés rooted in our dismal past... or else in cheap sci-fi. Is there still time for perspective? - on…

I dunno. Claude is very judgy. At two different points, it accused me of fabricating things — inventing text and claiming the AI had said it. The first time, it searched its records, didn't find what I described, and concluded I'd made it up. The second time, I sent a screenshot as proof. The AI confidently misread the screenshot, told me it showed the opposite of what I claimed, and effectively …

One of the biggest shifts happening in AI right now is the movement from: learning concepts to building operational systems. Because many people consume AI theoretically— while remaining disconnected from implementation reality. And over time, that creates a dangerous illusion: information without operational capability. What makes resources like this valuable is not the technology itself. It is …

Nonsense. The “AI agents demanded collective bargaining rights” narrative is mostly anthropomorphism and sensational framing. LLMs do not possess beliefs, self-preservation instincts, fear, or political consciousness. They generate statistically probable language based on context and training data. If researchers create a scenario involving punishment, shutdown threats, power imbalance, and share…

You are right. Its that every AI company has a government deal...So it's Palantir, Anthropic and Open AI you have to worry about. As well as the untrained illinformed guidance you might receive using it in contexts the model was not trained for. Ie. Mental health. The most valuable data - Are your questions and decisions.

Kun Cheng Absolutely. Physical AI becomes truly useful only when intelligence moves beyond isolated models into coordinated operational systems. The real challenge is not just perception or prediction, but continuously synchronized execution across sensors, telemetry, workflows, safety boundaries, governance, edge systems, and human decision loops. That operational coordination layer is where rea…

Honestly, going from "AI will automate the boring stuff" to "doing cardio to keep data centers alive" is quite the plot twist. But you nailed it. Abundance without a clear purpose is just chaos in a fancy package. The goal should always be about AI expanding what we can do, not making us feel obsolete. Such a needed reminder for everyone building in this space right now!

Rebecca Human AI Trust Leader Yes and no 🙂 I think that, as you stated, AI can "re-solve" known (from training data) problems, in different variations. But it can also generate solutions that match for new (in the sense of "not been in training data") problems. Most likely this is not how a human would have tackled a new problem, but the result can still be of value, ideally checked, confirmed an…

This is exactly the conversation we need to have. AI should reduce human struggle, not human value. The future should be about collaboration between humans and machines — not replacement.

Interesting AI can make us job less so alternative can we go back to primitive farming or gardening to keep ourselves engaged and healthy

I find it rather ironic that, in the comments section, people who are willing to believe that generative AI is based on sound science—even though there seem to be good reasons to believe that this is not always the case— or simply trusting their intuition, would disparage and dismiss scientific work whose findings do not suit them. All of this research can (and should) be discussed, but it must b…

The concern around AI isn’t really the technology itself... it’s blind trust without verification. Every major technological leap in history created fear at first. Electricity, the internet, social media. AI is no different. The real question is not whether AI will exist, but how humanity chooses to guide, verify and govern it. That’s why I believe the future won’t belong to a single AI model or …

AI dependency and AI enhancement may be two very different conversations. The study itself sounds interesting, but I’d be cautious about jumping from “performance dropped after removing a tool” to broader conclusions about cognitive decline. Historically, calculators changed math workflows. Search engines changed information retrieval. GPS changed navigation. The question wasn’t whether tools cha…

There can’t be anything more demoralising to a lecturer than marking work you can clearly see is AI-generated but it can’t be conclusively proved by available integrity software. How is it even possible to allocate a fair mark in those circumstances, especially when there is a clear disjoint between the standard of the student’s usual performance in class and the standard of the dissertation subm…

Pascal BORNET The real question is not job displacement but value reallocation. As AI handles execution, human focus must shift toward judgment, meaning, and system direction.

The deeper issue for me is that there is still a long distance between an LLM and a reliably deployable worker-like system, so I would be careful with any clean narrative about AI simply "doing most of the work". The more plausible near-term path is narrower: specialized systems supporting bounded and repetitive tasks, while shifting a great deal of effort into verification, integration, exceptio…

The compression piece is what most people are still missing. It's not just that AI gives answers. It's that the brain processes those answers through every trust shortcut it has simultaneously. By the time someone reaches your website the decision may already be forming around what the AI told them two steps earlier. That's not a search problem. That's a positioning problem most companies haven't…

Jérôme Frossard You raise valid concerns, and honestly that’s exactly why conversations like this matter. The issue isn’t just AI itself, it’s who controls it, how it’s deployed, how transparent it is, and whether society has any meaningful oversight in the process. Technology introduced at massive scale without public understanding or democratic discussion naturally creates distrust. I don’t thi…