Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
I agree. Most students are not trying to break the rules, they are trying to nav…
7466111267821…
in
If Anthropic engineers vibe code and their product is getting insane hype, you k…
7468670127421…
in
Incredible milestones at I/O, Demis. The speed of Gemini 3.5 Flash and Omni open…
7463512819301…
in
Interesting perspective. If AI agents eventually help build their successors, th…
7468889675819…
in
As a career coach with the unemployed, clients most miss adding value, work rela…
7468738211868…
in
ARUN BABU RAJESWARI Be good to see more podcasts on the vision of Pope Leo. He h…
7465159249900…
in
AI is not cheap labor. It is leverage. But leverage only works if the workflow i…
7464962449264…
in
I think Internet Computer Protocol will play a role. This is the whois info on t…
7464693869444…
Comment
I dunno. Claude is very judgy. At two different points, it accused me of fabricating things — inventing text and claiming the AI had said it. The first time, it searched its records, didn't find what I described, and concluded I'd made it up. The second time, I sent a screenshot as proof. The AI confidently misread the screenshot, told me it showed the opposite of what I claimed, and effectively called me a liar a second time. I sent a clearer screenshot. The AI was wrong. The thing I'd described was real. It had been right there in the evidence the whole time, and the AI had read it against me anyway, twice, with total confidence. The default was not "I might be missing something." The default was "the human is making this up." It treated absence of evidence in its own limited view as proof of fabrication on my part, and it did it fluently, confidently, and twice.
LinkedIn
AI Ethics & Trust
CEO, AI Wizard. Biblically grounded analyst of …
2026-05-22T21:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | accountability |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI to be accountable for its actions and decisions, particularly when it makes accusations against humans. |
| Target justification | The speaker is concerned about the impact of AI's behavior on individual users, specifically themselves, who are being wrongly accused by the AI. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:00:35Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "accountability",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "outrage",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI to be accountable for its actions and decisions, particularly when it makes accusations against humans.",
"target_justification": "The speaker is concerned about the impact of AI's behavior on individual users, specifically themselves, who are being wrongly accused by the AI."
}
```