Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
I find it rather ironic that, in the comments section, people who are willing to believe that generative AI is based on sound science—even though there seem to be good reasons to believe that this is not always the case— or simply trusting their intuition, would disparage and dismiss scientific work whose findings do not suit them. All of this research can (and should) be discussed, but it must be done with a minimum of seriousness. P.S. The paper is available as a preprint: “AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performance”
LinkedIn General AI Discourse Works hard to put young people in learning situ… 2026-05-23T10:3…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Primary valueaccountability
Secondary valuenone
Alignment targetsociety
Stancecritical
Emotionoutrage
Value justificationThe speaker wants individuals to be answerable for their beliefs and actions, particularly when it comes to trusting or dismissing scientific research on AI.
Target justificationThe target of the speaker's comment is the broader society, as they are addressing the way people in general discuss and interact with scientific research on AI.
Coded at2026-06-11T08:01:11Z
Raw LLM Response
``` { "value_primary": "accountability", "value_secondary": "none", "target": "society", "stance": "critical", "emotion": "outrage", "value_justification": "The speaker wants individuals to be answerable for their beliefs and actions, particularly when it comes to trusting or dismissing scientific research on AI.", "target_justification": "The target of the speaker's comment is the broader society, as they are addressing the way people in general discuss and interact with scientific research on AI." } ```