Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
When the singularity happens it will take months for people to vote to put all m…
ytc_Ugz9H6qGH…
G
I was going to ask this. He could have gotten this info from anywhere else if he…
rdc_nartqp4
G
yeah... .how would we the people make money? If robots did all the work for chea…
ytc_UgyndkOOK…
G
Besides how sad it is that people would rather share their problems with a glori…
ytc_UgzTR3dWL…
G
We may not be able to trust our eyes anymore, but there's still some forensic se…
rdc_o5ou5mk
G
Meanwhile she is Chinese and is pushing for "social change" in the US. What is …
ytr_Ugy6zuk-m…
G
I actually had something happen to me, I got commissioned for a piece, I drew it…
ytc_UgxivQkMS…
G
And we think the current mental health crisis is bad, just wait til this guy hit…
ytc_Ugy_iSUNk…
Comment
@NightsDwarf You cannot be using Chat GPT as your source to point out that my statements are flawed, my dude. Chat GPT is an ALGORITHM and it is completely biased to its input. Of course, it will answer like that. Do you think it will admit my statements? This chat AI was created by the same community behind the art AI generators. They are not id*ots. Also, 'get wrecked by its response?'. Like literally, nothing I mentioned is my own opinion, I said 'they', referring to people that undermine human art. I value art deeply, and I know others do too. But in a capitalized work, it is not so important the process, just the efficiency of the end product. You are fighting my statements as if I claimed anywhere anything in an absolute way. As an insider, I am just informing what I have witnessed from people in my community. Why the hell are you fighting me?
Also, let me give you a pro-tip: don't use an unsourced algorithm like chat GPT as your knowledge source. It undermines your ability to reason, which it is already questionable.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-27T04:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgwNnfnzCd_OMrhH2th4AaABAg.9k7IDQI0thZ9k7JRBUqOWp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwNnfnzCd_OMrhH2th4AaABAg.9k7IDQI0thZ9k7b2C9ksTu","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwNnfnzCd_OMrhH2th4AaABAg.9k7IDQI0thZ9k7cp6d1hge","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwSQfh1gb0Zo9U6TTh4AaABAg.9k7H2ZglVi39k7IU9T0c7t","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwSQfh1gb0Zo9U6TTh4AaABAg.9k7H2ZglVi39k7LeopFm3k","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzWPpHKsWuIyJvCGzV4AaABAg.9k7GDgH2KHK9k7dWAm87XM","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwiynEdeILAA2hJnxZ4AaABAg.9k7DtiDod1r9k7i2rl9A_-","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz9dpLvsUrjkk_WfHV4AaABAg.9k7CWH0fc2K9k8bGxLMZS2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxa_3RhStMPtVlNZnV4AaABAg.9k7AmhNto_79k7ETV5CR5_","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxa_3RhStMPtVlNZnV4AaABAg.9k7AmhNto_79k7Fi-GPIOA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]