Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Was actually really easy to tell imo (guy speaking) either AI (which I thought) … ytc_UgwaH9v_4… G "Hey there! As someone who's really curious about AI, I find SmythOS fascinating… ytc_UgwNA2amf… G AI isn't just learning and thinking like humans - for some time now humans have… ytc_UgyPXkC9E… G Hey @crozolrebeuname, thanks for your comment! Are you asking if I'm a time-trav… ytr_UgwqK_9Ia… G Haha, this is my constant fight with chatgpt while trying to talk code with it; … ytc_UgwtFxwkI… G Although I have friends, I can't talk to friends constantly at weird hours in th… rdc_n7ur4fs G I agree the road will be long and expensive for Ai developed by biased and selfi… ytr_UgyXhvWiH… G ⁠​⁠@sfmza🤣 music is totally subjective cuz I don’t think it was anywhere close t… ytr_Ugx-DKbI0…
Comment
Loomis argued that his Due Process was violated because the algorithm was proprietary and they couldn't rebut the "inner workings." That's a losing argument 10 times out of 10. If they ruled that you must be able to examine trade secrets, then virtually no hardware or software would be admissible in a court. If a security camera caught the event would Due Process be violated without exposing the entire hardware and software design of the camera? It ends up being a procedural issue. Since judges are given wide discretion during sentencing, you would have to prove that without COMPAS the judge would have sentences substantially different. It's totally a mischaracterization to say SCOTUS "doesn't care" simply because they did not hear the case. SCOTUS only has so much time, and they could simply have decided that there were no glaring issues in the Wisconsin supreme court decision on the appeal. Again, this was predominantly a procedural issue. And keep in mind, at the time there was still a liberal majority in the Court. If you want to ban states from using proprietary algorithms then *tell your representative!*
youtube 2022-07-26T20:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydistributed
Reasoningdeontological
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgzG42WDC-z6EpnwyYB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyN0MORpZaY1v49Lfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw-51QLPjQ6yxdapfx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxwxbiKbar9ktWP3iZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugwqf155AC7MjMLIQyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyNT-lVYcDsR1Z66KR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzDSexj0m_MZQrtp894AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz5xL4nSIRF2WVX5pB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw1i4_BYgtF5y6aGpN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyeKeAQU0xLkw3RKP54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"} ]