Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Their is another way to look at this: Autonomous systems have been in use for a … ytc_UgyTqQos-… G Humans really want to be special... they want to be above animals, yet being mam… ytc_Ugyt73CwE… G This is a really sad incident and my heart goes out to the family. AI is being p… ytc_Ugzo4bT-x… G Your quote in the description tells me everything about your ideology that I nee… ytc_UgzJZpP7c… G Please spare us the automaton who parrot's what you place in it's programing to … ytc_Ugwh0hcUM… G We appreciate you sharing your experience! It's totally normal to feel a bit anx… ytr_UgxU9U-7c… G As much as I hate to say this, you mentioned a lot of gaps and gray areas within… ytc_UgyIczphh… G Maybe the solution is to create socialist society, we throw out technology that … ytc_Ugx2z5erz…

Comment

That said, I align more with Lee's perspective: much of this could fall under fair use when done transformatively and ethically, as recent court decisions indicate. AI training isn't about copying outputs—it's about learning patterns, much like a human reading books to gain knowledge (though scaled up massively). Banning or overly restricting it would stifle progress, potentially handing global dominance to less scrupulous players like China, where copyright protections are even weaker. The hearing feels a bit one-sided, stacked with creator advocates, and overlooks how AI can amplify creativity (e.g., tools for writers to brainstorm or edit). Ultimately, I think the solution isn't prohibition but better frameworks: transparent licensing markets, opt-out mechanisms for creators, and regulations targeting bad actors rather than the tech itself. If Congress rushes to "fix" this without balance, we could end up with laws that hinder beneficial AI while doing little to stop real piracy. Innovation shouldn't come at the expense of creators, but neither should fear-mongering halt humanity's next big leap.

youtube 2025-07-20T17:4… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	distributed
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	industry_self
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwr3dIiPih0JbzDQgB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyGdfuTjM2Jfq6d4l4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzY9IIJg5bgXxt04nB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPTCZKMgGaFG7Ngxh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfEii3bZYFdqafkZF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxgJkm4VUz4ysIKddZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAwoyQNgfn1Jk7oYd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz8sQbjwoXOg7Q1Ou94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTNGxU00DTAYgW4qd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2zxiMYZ96lNUwTt94AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses