Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'm going to clone your voice using AI and then make you say the n word and then…
ytc_UgxhMLHKc…
G
Bernie Sanders aint wrong but we need to go full automated. Bc we will just sta…
ytc_UgxOoHzuw…
G
I work at a big company that just recently got into the AI-hype and I got the op…
ytc_UgzQJrCv3…
G
Nothing good is gonna come out of this!!!! This is gonna be disastrous! The male…
ytc_Ugzi4pHkp…
G
@bouttaletgo That seems impossible. The bar for consciousness appears to be much…
ytr_UgwunzFPx…
G
The AI bubble will not end AI. It will just be the inevitable wave of company co…
rdc_n7yombb
G
the biggest problem we all face, even now, and increasingly in the near future, …
ytc_Ugw7VTBJ9…
G
@CTJ21but the artist is pro ai, it doesn’t mean this specific artwork is ai? But…
ytr_UgwLHnlGp…
Comment
I think what he says doesn't make sense, when he says that AI is becoming more and more intelligent and surpasses humans in intelligence. That is, it has 150IQ, 170, 250 and then "takes off". What good is a car without a driver, if the pilot no longer uses the car. And if the man feels and the car doesn't, or if the car "felt" better, it absolutely couldn't do it without a driver. Where does the car "feel", from its own consciousness in relation to the man or only from what the man feels, being incapable of doing so. So how can it become more intelligent than you, since it depends on you and especially since it doesn't feel, it doesn't have affinities, it "can't make mistakes" because it can't recognize them. Everything seems like madness that doesn't make sense.
Only based on your observations does the AI discover its mistake, and only in a closed system like chess, when it can "see" itself. In an open system where imagination and desires drive existence, what does it do without humans?
youtube
AI Governance
2025-12-04T14:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzeR1W5VDn--za2c8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxl9wpvvs9iFpVseb14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz99OwhUI3RKR4bi5h4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzmO8O1N2RjBbwxVdl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvVSn9B4V0m92rK6B4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyINU-raCjuO7T0GgF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyxYnT6cvUSYcGGPM94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxoIzPw8kdAvShfoW94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyFZF6HXxSTfYp_-il4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYGlJSn9cEXEitIXd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]