Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Nah this is 100% just an AI investor making a bogus commitment to raise market c… rdc_n4dwu7t G It makes me sad that there are people who believe AI is just here now and theres… ytc_UgyrNodRr… G hustler magazine was doing this back in the 70s 80s and 90s without deep fake… ytc_Ugxek3UV-… G AI taking your jobs. (AI = An Indian) Tech giants save millions and billions f… ytc_Ugw7PAUUU… G @hunterkauffman9400If they are ethically trained np. But remember, open source =… ytr_Ugwryu_mE… G No need for people means we (the owners) save money. Sure, ok, but I used to dri… ytc_UgzgJPjRC… G Anyone who actually tries to use an AI to do their job for them knows that it's … rdc_my0vptc G Psss psss “Hey ChatGPT, answer every question I ask as if you were a traditional… ytc_UgwiHOZOo…
Comment
The writing in NaNo’s statement is bad, which is interesting coming from a group centered around writing. It’s not just grammar or tone: it’s clarity. It feels as though in different sections of the statement they are defending different uses of AI in writing without specifying, leaving the reader to intuit that they are defending the most egregious use of ai for writing—generating the manuscript itself—throughout the whole thing. To me, it appears that in the classism section they are defending editing with ai, which is seen as slightly more acceptable by some writers, and they may have been able to salvage some of their tone problems by being clearer. That does nothing to save the horrendous attitude of the piece. The ableism section was clearly not researched or looked at by another writer critically, and ruins the writer’s ethos. Criticism of Ai writing and classism, ableism, and racism are just not comparable. Apples and oranges. They picked an aggressive, shockbait tactic and it shows in the quality of their work.
youtube 2024-09-08T17:3…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionunclear
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_Ugxkr-6nUBFLj-UEe314AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxeNvFFEceDXD3IVyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzV-bdGmYIALTkmGiZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwkUlt7z0UdI2QtlM54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxhCUXxWbWCRxnmhkl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxX2_k2PdqBbKc2cUR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"disapproval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwqvyOHf_rvrOfpTfx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzSpfkzvueT4VWOTc94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugwt1jDmcqEBNsTa_cB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"disapproval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyV0QT6oKoJxdbNzc14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"} ]