Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It's very easy to defend against super intelligence, you just rig the grid to di…
ytc_UgzEgOovj…
G
Yep. Even more so as we are comparing how AI handles code at a very early stage …
ytr_UgwGNPcrH…
G
It's called Capitalism, not Laborism. If corps push too hard it will create "so…
ytc_Ugy8x2h1y…
G
Thanks for the recommendation! "Electric Dreams" has a fascinating take on AI an…
ytr_UgzmY1G1Y…
G
Soooo... Let's say one would write a bot that prompts an AI to do some specific …
ytc_UgwvyAubE…
G
If so many people went jobless due to companies replacing workers with AI, polit…
ytc_Ugzjm3Kgc…
G
Even though Ai is a prediction mirror right now, the process they are speaking o…
ytc_Ugw2DP2Bb…
G
@ironbrian66 how would a robot be there sooner than a real person, they both go…
ytr_Ugwjof6X6…
Comment
A lot of the money for a ubi would come from rich people paying taxes.
The only way a member of the bourgeoise can profit from this is if the money they make from people paying with their ubi is greater than the amount that this member of the bourgeoise contributed to that buyer's ubi.
So my conclusion is that ubi would only benefit those who safe more money from automation then they contribute to ubi. But if the economy becomes fully automated then only the rich could possibly contribute to the ubi and hence a new 1% of the 1% would be created.
This 1% of the 1% would be the the owners of businesses that make up a really large amount of what people want to buy.
This 1% of the 1% would accumulate money from the 99% of the 1% who contribute more to ubi then they get out of it. This is because the ubi money that profits the 1% of the 1% must be coming from somewhere and as we've established it can't bet the 99%.
I look forward to this 0.99% complaining about oppression.
youtube
2021-03-09T14:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4UwmXj8-9eUjQoJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugznw77bkxw1KuIowWh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaZO6frH5RAULN15J4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVXh3NA0-UKs7DSOZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGRsyq2MoNrPVwc-p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7ClEQM6iPKWcTH2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyeYAzpSX0KZgAJil4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKqiIHphB7g9TKc694AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwObQuRUlVZqWZWZqN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZgJcWPLh277vhoaJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]