Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think the interrogator should ask the AI questions about it opinions on variou…
ytc_UgwZwnU-V…
G
I used to be the new one the first chat always goes longer than the other ones a…
ytc_UgzaitFPY…
G
Automation already taken away the need for pretty much any jobs I have held or t…
ytc_Ugynk_i3J…
G
If you want to use AI that's one thing but what the hell is the motivation behin…
ytc_UgzIIGDUH…
G
I'm not a good graphic artist, I much prefer to draw with words (in my mother to…
ytc_UgxeDBUui…
G
The more i use AI the more it becomes obvious they are reflections of us, of hum…
ytc_UgzIfJNxg…
G
I just draw a stickman and it still looks higher quality than AI, I can definite…
ytc_UgxbbZSr1…
G
If I can make more then I make right now collecting U.B.I, I’ll collect it in a …
ytc_UgxdHCjUh…
Comment
LLM's should never be used to evaluate résumés. It is as easy as that. There are way too many problems atm:
1. As mentioned the LLM will have bias from its training data
2. Future training data can get polluted by the LLM's reinforcing the bias.
3. It is a black box. We can't explain how it made the decision so how can HR justify using it? What if they are accused of breaking the law?
4. If these LLM's get popular companies start hiring using very similar patterns. If discrimination is bad now imagine all companies discriminating in the exact same way against the same people. We could end up with some people being unable to get a job for having the wrong name or date of birth
5. Companies can and absolutely will get accused of forming a cartel because they use the same LLM. It isn't that different than directly working together for price fixing instead it happens on the hiring side.
There are probably many more issues ...
reddit
AI Bias
1730492102.0
♥ 157
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | ban |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_luwvnwc","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_luwz8l5","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_luzsin6","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_lv1gtup","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_luxtq7d","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]