Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Unfortunately, it's already here, and we've been under increasing surveillance f…
ytc_UgzTNfxLc…
G
1. Rights are nothing. It is basically what we believe in.
2. Only conscious bei…
ytc_Ugx_28QwU…
G
There is no No A.I. I propose instead, A.P.P., Artificial Perception (and data) …
ytc_Ugxm7DUKM…
G
No need to report, if you are making billions then you are happy about it.…
ytr_UgxOOeqOU…
G
Why aren't these researchers developing -negative A.I.? Set a.i. a couple parame…
ytc_UgwY816j8…
G
I think there is an argument to be made that ai isnt qualitatively different fro…
ytc_Ugyj3gQWY…
G
I am of two minds with all the AI Art discourse. I think AI Art is interesting, …
ytc_UgxeEd292…
G
UBI is a pipe dream
ZEROOOOO governments will give it
It’s a dream, nobody bu…
ytc_Ugz3zHM5f…
Comment
Some real lawyers and the Barristers association must have threatened to sue ChatGPT to protect their industry. Cannot let the pleabians have free access to low cost legal advice.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1682179085.0
♥ 23
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | ban |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_jha39w3","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jhan25b","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_jhba7ng","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_jha6m52","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_jhcjk34","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]