Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Thanks Qi Han Wong, very interesting!This maps very directly to legal AI too. Language is not jurisdiction. A Spanish prompt may require Argentine, Spanish, Mexican, or US law. An English contract may still be governed by Argentine law. If the model silently treats language as a proxy for geography or governing law, it may understand the risk correctly but route the answer through the wrong institutional pathway. For legal and compliance AI, explicit jurisdiction anchoring is not a detail. It is a safety layer: governing law, forum, user location, institutional authority, and role of the user all matter.
LinkedIn AI Safety & Risk Senior Corporate Lawyer | Independent Director … 2026-05-31T18:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Primary valuesafety
Secondary valuenone
Alignment targetindividual_users
Stancedemanding
Emotionapproval
Value justificationThe comment emphasizes the importance of explicit jurisdiction anchoring as a safety layer in legal and compliance AI to prevent incorrect routing of answers.
Target justificationThe comment highlights the need for AI systems to consider the individual user's location, institutional authority, and role to provide accurate and safe recommendations.
Coded at2026-06-11T08:35:08Z
Raw LLM Response
``` { "value_primary": "safety", "value_secondary": "none", "target": "individual_users", "stance": "demanding", "emotion": "approval", "value_justification": "The comment emphasizes the importance of explicit jurisdiction anchoring as a safety layer in legal and compliance AI to prevent incorrect routing of answers.", "target_justification": "The comment highlights the need for AI systems to consider the individual user's location, institutional authority, and role to provide accurate and safe recommendations." } ```