Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You're on the wrong side of this, Charlie. People were saying the same thing abo…
ytc_Ugw1wm7Pr…
G
Autopilot doesn't mean completely autonomous. Autonomous hardware was ready insi…
ytc_UgxAMcPJz…
G
It's not particularly the AI that's at fault, but the corrupt ones who use it ir…
ytc_Ugy56i3yC…
G
My favourite as somebody running 365 for a team is, "that feature does not exist…
rdc_mryfb84
G
Многие даже не осознают насколько опасен может быть в будущем искусственный инте…
ytc_Ugyw6yeAC…
G
Use only ai, on things you don't know, things you want to clarify, by that you a…
ytc_UgxQIx5RL…
G
"Let`s draw a cute AI cartoon girl", draw something I wouldn't even put in an ho…
ytc_Ugyf5yYSE…
G
Might be sycophantic, but I asked AI, although I forgot how I asked, but one of …
ytc_Ugy1hWLM3…
Comment
Google should up to people doing seaches, whatever that user is searching for. What they're doing with machine learning is trying to take a guess at what a user means when they something as unspecific as such as "shoe". Right now, their algorithm runs the risk of being too narrow, due to the biases. Google want to overcome this.
No. It is not at all sexist to provide people with different results based on their gender. It's a little naive, a little basic. Ideally, we would want to serve users different results based on differences in what they are actually looking for. Gender can be an indicator of this, but Google pretty clearly want to move on the more precise and robust indicators. Gender is good, but still very rough.
youtube
AI Bias
2017-08-26T10:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxFSBR1fccZhUpAPLh4AaABAg.8X9YdotL2FD8X9brX1a_pZ","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy-xgV3WeXI8GRR5vZ4AaABAg.8X21IpT6-T_8X9_FHKU0Wq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxUF0NgMk2XbjcOTLN4AaABAg.8Wlq_p0UDWX8WmNsKZjJwD","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzS0d_hiYY-las7zxB4AaABAg.8WibpzKM9lB8WihZ9c43b-","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzS0d_hiYY-las7zxB4AaABAg.8WibpzKM9lB8WiklrXRHzH","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxf3nZXVD3q_XEXGnh4AaABAg.8WiH55mNZN28WiiEw8UlFZ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyEXtana9HUXy5iB0R4AaABAg.8WhLaHiOkMs8Wkuy5ihcl1","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmIGscl53btE5R0OV4AaABAg.8Wguh4FSIdR8Wh1e0OcJbC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwh23tsbFv5YB11ioB4AaABAg.8WguBmEHjPL8WgxkxpVR-v","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwpEMUhCSHwQdFCei94AaABAg.AGE5EZ_NLwAAKcj6IBrKmO","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]