Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
What I always hate is people calling AI art robbers. How do you think the human …
ytr_UgwBqYDzc…
G
im here after the recent ghibli trend made by chatgpt, im so fucking pisses off
…
ytc_UgzI6FIHh…
G
What problems do humans create that an AI would think needs to be "dealt with"?…
ytr_Ugyco9Oyu…
G
It will never completely replace manual human labor. AI & robotics still require…
ytr_UgwpWvipU…
G
Very soon AI generated content will be so refined that you can't even detect aga…
ytc_UgyycMJZ3…
G
It is okay, even legally speaking - style isn't copyrightable. And as a non-disa…
ytr_UgxPe_PGr…
G
The answer to this AI problem is to have a robust redistribution of profits of c…
ytc_UgyJc9Ovn…
G
Let the machines live our dreams. Let them feed on our colective creativity and …
ytc_UgxjwPKv4…
Comment
@derlon858 „sure lets go back to living in caves, ”
Cute strawman.
„its not defeatism its progress”
False actually. This entire mess is the opposite of progress. Seriously, think logically. In what world is the destruction of social trust, the increase in the quality and quantity of fake news, the devaluation and commodification of art, and automation going the exact opposite way it is meant to „progress”? Seriously, all this nonsense is more like the opposite of progress.
„you either adapt or you get extinguished”
1. This type of thinking is psychotic.
2. Again with calling the act of meekly submiting „adaptation”. This is not adaptation. Glaze is adaptation. Legal actions against AI are adaptation. Social opposition to AI is adaptation. Meekly submitting to what the tech companies want is not adaptation.
„thats how nature works”
You say this while defending one of the least natural things ever.
But anyway, the „its nature” argument is nonsense, and is also a falacy.
„go get real”
Why do you think I oppose it?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2023-08-20T17:5…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugz7WKQi83lGt2CpKpJ4AaABAg.9tn6_g9xcnC9tvke33v9nr","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxOePm02IE7oMygMyF4AaABAg.9tmi9fbW_f79tn6PhY7hfP","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxOePm02IE7oMygMyF4AaABAg.9tmi9fbW_f79vd4jDBG11p","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxOePm02IE7oMygMyF4AaABAg.9tmi9fbW_f79w1F4rpCbur","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxIAXXX8vCxbB-LMGt4AaABAg.9tlRL7M_i139vB6uJp7YOH","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyZCD-GceRJ5lnaI0t4AaABAg.9tjWeIt_4D69tm456Cu8Ff","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyZCD-GceRJ5lnaI0t4AaABAg.9tjWeIt_4D69tn6ZLaT9_Q","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzMs2mp3NMEW41pu1F4AaABAg.9taoRULYjIU9tb8DCJSICF","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzMs2mp3NMEW41pu1F4AaABAg.9taoRULYjIU9tdjIYrGzRs","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzMs2mp3NMEW41pu1F4AaABAg.9taoRULYjIU9uIZ36A9VFS","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]