Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'm actually an electrician- I simply phone this number and give money to this d…
ytc_Ugx5jiJ_L…
G
YEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS. YOU WILL EARN MORE RESPECT FROM THAT AND ACTUALLY TR…
ytr_UgyRh3_Qh…
G
Thank you for this video! It's refreshing to have your positive attitude amongst…
ytc_UgwETmNFx…
G
Also, this will just make the ENTIRE SYSTEM COLLAPSE!!! I'm no economist, but si…
ytc_Ugxf3d68J…
G
The AI is literally stealing from existing art in order to function. The idea th…
ytc_UgwrVlubR…
G
@Gurziakit doesn't AI art is already replacing art, AI is also already started …
ytr_Ugy1o-Z_-…
G
AI art is thankfully getting worse since it's started copying other AIs,
It's …
ytc_UgykKfNEk…
G
Considering that he told the AI multiple times to be straight to the point and i…
ytr_UgwGB4beF…
Comment
I’ll throw in my own two cents as a ML student researcher, but I’d argue you offer an alternative instead of saying it’s not bad but no solution.
My take is that it does steal artists work. But rather than their entire piece, it’s their labor. In many cases, it takes artists years to develop skills, such as the correct brush stroke. While yes, artists get inspiration, the difference is when the work is your own. AI art uses other people’s skills (brush strokes, color choices, artistic styles) and replicates something else using those parameters in their model.
I think it would be better for everyone if there was a better way of acquiring training data, famous art pieces not owned by one individual but seen as societally shared (like a piece in a museum seen by all) or pieces which artists explicitly allow for AI to be trained on. This would make it much less controversial and could offer an opportunity for artists to use AI in their own works.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-22T18:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugwj5-JFnQBMy7_-gr54AaABAg.9jwoJAPi32n9jwoXUbC32U","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzKEfI1v5uL8n6qnkB4AaABAg.9jwaip6GRoP9jxF_A903g1","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzKEfI1v5uL8n6qnkB4AaABAg.9jwaip6GRoP9jzN3_8AOw3","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwjTZXPWc04e4VNVix4AaABAg.9jwP9aJdrRU9jxOhZExDCZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyRKFeec-szjWhVb6B4AaABAg.9jwO9Tz3zYf9k1f-cXf1GB","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxn9gTRDk5GhXwwWWR4AaABAg.9jwGOK8TTze9jwIdwih3iO","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw9Lvi5iKF16GhgOgl4AaABAg.9jvsisMyjwi9jvx_0_uzSB","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw9Lvi5iKF16GhgOgl4AaABAg.9jvsisMyjwi9k3UKhAVdzf","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwvE-EK9aFXKtTLTiB4AaABAg.9jvhKVHLEAh9jwmGtpLtwk","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwvE-EK9aFXKtTLTiB4AaABAg.9jvhKVHLEAh9jwnwHO4E1G","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]