Raw LLM Responses

​@topyraftIt's just that ai just so happens to require the least amount of effort and input in a field, that, conveniently, requires a lot of effort and any sort of input. There is still some effort and input in photography which are the fundamentals of photography and making it look good over all. There is still some effort and input in 3d animation which is obviously the technical knowhow, sculpting, tweening and loads of other stuff. We are humans, we were born to live through moments, and not try to get the end result as quick as possible, and you see obviously that there is a significant drop in quality. But what is there to learn or put effort into as an art form in ai? Besides putting in prompts. You don't control exactly the output either. The thing is, it's really extraordinary for the field it tries to put itself in, with a lot of modern flaws. That's why it most likely won't be a valid art form and I won't even begin to mention the bad effects of using it. I believe your comment says it's a matter of whether ai will be a valid art form in the future (please correct me if I'm wrong). And I know people say that stuff about modern things, and the truth is, after that innovation comes, you usually see the good stuff behind it. However, it has been 4 years and I have seen nothing good come out of ai, maybe angel Engine but that drowns in all the bad things I've seen. I also don't think that ai will get much better than this but it'll still feel artificial somehow, just like that artificial orange flavour. It might taste good but it's probably healthier for you to eat real oranges in the long run. But I'd like to see your thoughts.