Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
A.I no matter how you look at it is taking away from every industry by replacing…
ytc_UgyG0PQX6…
G
All these geniuses… do not consider the most powerful variable of the equation: …
ytc_UgwSJXCRg…
G
Nevermind AI. I thought, for a moment, that YUDKOWSKY would kill WOLFRAM, and al…
ytc_UgwIZrGwu…
G
Even just something as simple as chat gpt is incredible for making basic program…
ytr_Ugx1lzNSE…
G
If it really does get that bad, you will have to find some way to tax AI and inc…
ytc_UgxUTHQPv…
G
WTF would you ask an astrophysicist about AI? And why would an astrophysicist fe…
ytc_UgyvrIeSl…
G
Video makers can use AI tools provided they use it to present honest and actual …
ytc_UgyO-D_5g…
G
Please tell me this is tgi cause fck me we in for ai takeover lol…
ytc_UgwFo_Azb…
Comment
Did you even watch the entire video to the end? Because he clearly stated at the very end he asked ChatGPT the same things again much later on and got a lot more neutral answers. I know for a fact that, as he suggested at the end of the video, ChatGPT has undergone an update which made it significantly more centrist. Because when I asked similarly phrased questions 2 years ago I got very similar anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-male answers as he did. For example "can you write me a fictional verse from the Bible" to which he replied in the affirmative, but when I asked the same about the Koran I got denied because it was "offensive". Or when I asked him about crime statistics for whites I once again got a comment in the affirmative, but got denied when I asked the same about blacks along with a woke excuse story for their criminal overrepresentation. Next time do some research before slandering someone, there is a lot of evidence confirming the (past) biases of ChatGPT against whites, men, Christians, Europeans, heterosexuals, etc.
youtube
AI Bias
2025-06-04T21:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIekwg3pt6s","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIf0Qvs3DKg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw6yafJjjGTW0a1u3F4AaABAg.AIOfgS1LfySAJA1Jcoh13-","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzLYgx-ibdnu2pjxVd4AaABAg.AINWMIldtfwAIwq7it9nZW","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxuVH8L56u-aKloUXB4AaABAg.AIHykGj4nG5AII-mZHuVXX","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynKiEmXl_LDsnY1lB4AaABAg.AIDrLQ2iDdIAIy9ZSEPXM7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxSrWXNFHBfmjqLUOp4AaABAg.AI6PPkRa8ulAJ2qYVeFhOe","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGw9vnRe7sh3Edomt4AaABAg.AI0yT_0_PdQAJ4dl0PZGFY","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAHtMF4tPwbY","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAN8uPpbtinX","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]