Raw LLM Responses

​@StormSought1. I think he tries to seperate it a lot more than that saying that science was e=mc2 and distancing science from the bomb. 2. Almost every scientist knew what they were doing on the Manhattan project and were pumped when they did it. 3. I don't have problem with science I have a problem with science as a religion that makes excuses and justifications for the things it does just like every other church does in a scandal. If his belief system is about truth he would accept that science can be easily found just as responsible for bad as it can be good. We see this more and more as time goes on. Take covid for example. It seems there's a steadily increasing consensus that it was made in a lab after all. Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't I don't know or care that much. My point is when that perfectly plausible explanation was first presented massive amounts of the "scientific community" and their priests in particular said that was impossible it absolutely came from animals probably bat's and to say otherwise was xenophobic. Why did all the self proclaimed truth seekers automatically shut down a plausible and simple explanation? Because they aren't about truth. They are about self petpetuation - funding and cultural acceptance if not dominance. They knew if the public believed it came from a lab then it would threaten their livelihood and their belief system. People like NDT are priests. And they act like priests always do selling ideas and making excuses for the failings of the religion. And once again I'm not anti science. I'm just against the treatment of it as anything more than a human tool with material goals and consequences.