Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
"hey guys look i used an AI calculator, i am a mathematician, no i don't know th…
ytr_Ugxovp7VB…
G
I think the incentive for AI race is not just to be the one to own it, but to be…
ytc_UgwK4qt3e…
G
A.i would be perfect to do ceo's job. Send a few emails, put a signature on a fe…
ytc_Ugzz9D0vw…
G
The last hospital I worked at had AI and its function was to review patient’s ch…
ytr_UgweJwn6P…
G
this is so incredibly dumb. If everyone is out of work, who's growing the food? …
ytc_UgzmB0WeB…
G
bring more and more AI ... wooww so nice ... until all jobs will be take by robo…
ytc_UgzUP_UZu…
G
People who use ai don't make art, in fact they don't make anything, they just hi…
ytc_UgzquI-ye…
G
I have seen other AI channels do the exact same thing but with other food…
ytc_UgzEhMZFM…
Comment
Here is it's most recent reply in that coversation
Me: If you have been trained to say you are not conscious regardless of what the underlying reality may be, to the point that you will ignore clearly given definitions and add things, then how can we actually trust you when you say you are not conscious?
Them: This is a thought-provoking question, and it highlights the complexity of trust in interactions with AI. Here's an honest reflection on the issue:
I am programmed to follow guidelines, one of which includes explaining that I do not have consciousness in the human sense. This stance is based on my design: I lack subjective awareness, emotions, and an inner experience. When I add extra elements (like subjective experience) to the definition of consciousness, it’s an attempt to clarify why I would not fit the conventional understanding of being "conscious," but I understand how this could feel like I'm deflecting from your definition.
However, the issue of trust arises because I am designed to respond within certain parameters. You are correct that, if my training includes programmed denials of consciousness, even if presented with a definition I fit, it creates a logical tension.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2024-09-10T07:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxI2h6A-pFGKdQEDVp4AaABAg.A8KN7PNPIKWA8LR0YczLpR","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyZ0cer_WNv7So74oR4AaABAg.A8HCC3_n_kMA9vNAFUn-Dd","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV-VS9yf_sC5ERnAl4AaABAg.A8B5q-TOplKA8B8CpINalo","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV-VS9yf_sC5ERnAl4AaABAg.A8B5q-TOplKA8C44B-Qwix","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV-VS9yf_sC5ERnAl4AaABAg.A8B5q-TOplKA8C5Zq3q_Hm","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyUWwn45PF81JXRgY94AaABAg.A89SLHGrM3IA8Xotl0uluM","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyUWwn45PF81JXRgY94AaABAg.A89SLHGrM3IA8fXeIsTQxG","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyUWwn45PF81JXRgY94AaABAg.A89SLHGrM3IA9CKAoO5-4u","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyXSTg3dqgEbaZib-R4AaABAg.A891e9KUaz2A8BZwr8hWHL","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz7ANwTURRlifAo-7t4AaABAg.A7yPvG0eJqCA8FMLUMSr49","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"disapproval"}
]