Raw LLM Responses

@DAS5H-zc7vw  to to generate AI image you need to write prompt - it's work. Many AI artists also use photoshop to change some parts of image, draw some part by themselves and add text. It's easier than digital art, but digital art is easier than traditional art and yet we don't think that digital art is worse than traditional. Also you didn't say any argument about why is amount of work is criteria of artistic value. Regarding originality. If an AI artist writes the prompt "rabbit", the resulting image will not be original. However, the same applies to digital and traditional artists. A rabbit is not something original, nature invented rabbits millions or billions of years ago, and an ordinary image of a rabbit is not original. But an image of a rabbit in a certain composition is original, provided that the author has not come across this composition before. And the originality of the image is ensured precisely through the unification of different images familiar to a person, and therefore can be achieved by an AI artist. Examples include clothing designers, chefs or musicians. Clothing designers may not sew their own clothes, but delegate this mechanical work to seamstresses, while they themselves are engaged in the creative part. And their authorship of the clothes is not questioned, although they personally did not make them. Chefs who write recipes may not cook them in real life, but this does not mean that their dish isn't original. Musicians can write notes for a melody without playing it in real life (for example, because they don’t know how to play any instruments), but this doesn’t make their melody any less original. And if you're stating that art is original only if it's made personally, than the only "real" art is self body art where instead of brushes person uses their fingers and instead of ink thay use their body liquids.