Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G For a work to be truly transformative, it would have to be created by someone wh… ytc_Ugy-Aaest… G He posted A.I art and got absolutely demolished for it, i don't see the funny.… ytc_UgxGgMcj4… G honestly I used chatgpt 3.5 a lot, and I believe he probably could have gotten i… ytc_Ugw-sACa3… G "Humans will have nothing to do in the future". Why do people think that work = … rdc_ogxvhx3 G The biggest flaw in this thinking is imagining no one sees it coming, and imagin… ytc_Ugy753227… G Took me years to realise I actually was getting somewhere and have learnt differ… ytc_UgyOsm259… G for the last six months, I have been self teaching my self ai or as we call it, … ytc_UgwSP4XN6… G Thanks for your enthusiasm! We're glad you enjoyed the interaction with Sophia. … ytr_UgylIbByw…

Comment

Yes and no. Because AI needs an input (and an output) prompt, the current way it works probably won't do the full set of tasks better than a human can. If the only aim was productivity, humans working with AI would probably be the most effective. Thing is, which few people account for: Companies hate workers. Personnel costs is the majority of costs of most (if not all) companies. So even if AI will do the job worse than people, *it would still be worth it for the companies.* Cutting some production in favor of vastly lowered costs (we're talking 50% or something), would probably be a winning strategy. Not only that, but by cutting workers off of production, you remove their power. Strikes? Useless. Boycotts? Outdated. Unions? Pointless. Without being tied to production, workers can't make a reason for companies to care about their rights or needs. So basically, AI probably won't be as good as humans are, but it doesn't need to be. It just needs to be good enough.

youtube AI Jobs 2025-09-10T22:3… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	regulate
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_Ugyj4hmaQ7m2ABDVKwZ4AaABAg.AMv64sHUSOmAMw0hCsg3_E","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwbFVeBPLe-u8hUcSN4AaABAg.AMucBAnSrfVAMva3jtb-ye","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMu_i0N-yEy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMviBII6Tgn","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMvi_UQDGul","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxdPJEGAbpI5rB-Svh4AaABAg.AE_Cn_ZPUOjAPchAc6vuQn","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzHyOQBTTjDmIyBO5d4AaABAg.AEQqMR514UtARylXQgKw2o","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxHfGnh5L7CdBhzQvF4AaABAg.AEPGOMfszOMAPch3Oa4M2V","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzH6AIwAo7-NJjkrmJ4AaABAg.A0oHwbHLDfyA0xSbW9xpLy","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw1i8eGpRAK2YvzMH94AaABAg.9rxxb5j63hI9sJX5ANahNN","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses