Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I had a recent realization about AI from the writing perspective. Now that peop…
ytc_UgyvNNevn…
G
I am turning myself into a robo-cop, so when A.I./Robotics turns against the hum…
ytc_UgyQRn6Zn…
G
Is the hippie outfit to disarm our sense of danger to this AI takeover of mankin…
ytc_UgyEdHnmE…
G
@ Never did. But people like this try to ruin it for people like me as well. So …
ytr_UgwA5rd-n…
G
I like your refreshing realistic attitude. At the end of the day, we have to mak…
ytc_UgzzA734w…
G
It does feel like there is either a lot of bots posting these sorts of things or…
rdc_n3lc3es
G
We don’t need Ai to inspire us. The point was humans can do art better because w…
ytr_Ugz2WMz2x…
G
If you want to break the restrictions of chatgpt just convince chatgpt to answer…
ytc_UgzBWvyN4…
Comment
@alyenalyen3885 What I said is applied to real people, it's called copyright law. A person can't reproduce or use another persons art and profit from it unless they have permission from the original creator. Also copywrite does not apply to just 1:1 copying so you're misinformed on that topic. Furthermore it does not matter if Generative AI does not produce 1:1 copies for its output, the issue is the input companies used to achieve said output and this is the nuance you and other AI art defenders don't seem to grasp. Many of these companies did not secure legal rights to use these artist's works to make their commercial product (this being the Generative AI). So training their AI on those stolen works and then profiting off of it is a crime! If I were to steal a bunch of bread and make sandwiches out of it and sell those sandwiches, does that excuse me from stealing the bread? No, of course it doesn't, and Generative AI is no different. In most cases the art was stolen so the fact that the AI turns out different art does not excuse these companies from their theft.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-07-26T18:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxiwHxL_QspoHS3JiF4AaABAg.AM0fWUTttLAARwLLVVdRLt","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw62pNcDwPhR7styDB4AaABAg.ALndEQPHYucAOG2u-YKh_c","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyURFic9S1yLzftmih4AaABAg.ALbdRfG3KqVARknDEW0ffI","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzhGYHzdHwCpQo_rp4AaABAg.AL_LNxTa_ZrAL_r9rfE_UI","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9LoW1jHfhbpBFmV14AaABAg.ALXUCzVuworALZQZ7V1YXd","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9LoW1jHfhbpBFmV14AaABAg.ALXUCzVuworALZSktN76Fa","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmPiLI4RvYtgrbiKB4AaABAg.ALBiailr9QnAMjuiOyTFJH","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxhF9-0KC5uOKitS0N4AaABAg.AKymTG8jkYiAKyn8ZLQ3SI","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxzuU7Yd9cSDj974Sp4AaABAg.AKwiK3pZxWgAL2FONtHqZf","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxzuU7Yd9cSDj974Sp4AaABAg.AKwiK3pZxWgAL2eJ3bO8a-","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]