Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I have been reading these arguments for a few months now and it seems there is n…
ytr_UgztBmBfw…
G
at 56:50 the comment was made that every Billionaire wants to have their own AI …
ytc_Ugxo1V3zw…
G
People will be replaced by people who are able to use AI. What do u think?…
ytc_UgxjgYSZG…
G
Basics.
We keep feeding something we are not sure of, possibly afraid of,and the…
ytc_UgzuXImXV…
G
I just want to say thank you. Thank you so much Sam for speaking out about this.…
ytc_Ugx6Iq5El…
G
Basically they are making people insecure about the AI. I’ve been using these AI…
ytc_UgzJBqnOp…
G
That school is racist!! Public education and sitting in a desk is the only way t…
ytc_UgwIAg1yC…
G
@LC-mq8iq can you even call your comment an argument at this point? If i was in…
ytr_UgybPF_21…
Comment
Ironically, you could use Gödel’s incompleteness theorem to argue the opposite of what Penrose claims. If a human mind can be seen as a formal system (with all the limitations that implies), then a more powerful system — say, a sufficiently advanced AI trained on the full corpus of human knowledge and behavior — could emulate that human's reasoning, including their limitations.
Just as Gödel showed that stronger systems can observe the limits of weaker ones, an AI doesn't have to be "more conscious" than humans — just sufficiently general to represent and simulate a wide range of human cognition. Even if it couldn’t emulate the smartest possible human, it could emulate anyone less than that, which is still incredibly powerful. And with access to a massive dataset of human behavior, AI can interpolate and generalize from a collective cognitive “dataset” much larger than any single mind.
So rather than proving AI can’t understand things, Gödel's theorem could support the idea that understanding is always relative to the expressive power of a system — and there’s no reason to think the human mind is the final word in that hierarchy.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-05-02T06:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugx_y9ucmZhAuJ3S6014AaABAg.AHic2_QbvN4AHixJwlk1W0","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynMZVLuH0CfIvyW5R4AaABAg.AHi8cqyQ94iAHlrmkd8Aen","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw5_2-wz56JLBZ_07t4AaABAg.AHh7r803MQxAI4a-S8eYWb","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugzxb-o7OZ28YoWQ2b54AaABAg.AHfo8XdioTVAI8ezAhzMeE","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugzxb-o7OZ28YoWQ2b54AaABAg.AHfo8XdioTVAIFktSHqjRQ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwQjTIuc2Uo6_mduiZ4AaABAg.AHeQZrE4T8AAHt0WmSjI3a","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwQjTIuc2Uo6_mduiZ4AaABAg.AHeQZrE4T8AAIK957BVmo0","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyDPaw-1NkOE3EuIPV4AaABAg.AHcJIXxHV5gAI9O5GTiuJL","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzHIF4VhKO1AZZAY2d4AaABAg.AHcDd07P-tMAHfhfgjtQo5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxz50LXjYTtB1FzpyZ4AaABAg.AHbXB6cE8vWAHbZC5d6zh7","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]