Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This isn’t a ChatGPT conversation. So make believe. Unless they’re editing it, b…
ytc_UgwtHtZwb…
G
1. AI art can be art
2. AI art isn't theft
(Just to be clear, I quite frankly …
ytc_Ugy_gDdaO…
G
Question :
Is there really any difference between AI and human artists ?
Becaus…
ytc_UgyNr8i-a…
G
In this specific case your outlook might be correct, but considering that US GDP…
ytc_UgycCRtAM…
G
@alicat398most definitely. We use the resources we have now combined with AI to…
ytr_Ugx_28Tv7…
G
The fact is AI robots are developed enough to cause an irreversibile damage in o…
ytc_Ugz45aefH…
G
Also the human mind is not comparable to transformer based generative intelligen…
ytr_Ugyud_Tmx…
G
Imagine how many accidents could have been prevented iff Open AI were integrated…
ytc_UgxMjx5VS…
Comment
@RuslanKD @shilpidey3184 As a Computer Engineer you should know that chatgpt is designed to be very friendly and very agreeable. I understand the benefits of using Ai to practice debates with the potential to avoid the usual risk of it being warped by human emotions and biases. You should already know that gpt will, a lot of the time, take whatever information you give it or assert to it at face value. The issue with this is, like I noticed in the flow of the video, after you give your answer to gpt, it does not question or demand proof for the claims that you make.
It just processes your answer and moves on to the next question without diving deeper into the context or proof of your claims/answers. Would it not be intellectually dishonest then to act that this "podcast" is somehow something to support our faith when the debate opponent (Chatgpt) is very prone to just agreeing with whatever answer you give as long as it follows some logic?
youtube
2024-09-27T13:1…
♥ 12
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgyfPhvnM_uMLXmOyjR4AaABAg.A8nhJbNxXixA8o3mGc3xU-","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxKau967Wog7tlNuqF4AaABAg.A8nBNn1Lim_A8tVT-Egxte","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgySLp7aEzFoizph0LZ4AaABAg.A8n7zdXkOCWA8s7RjE5-_C","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_Yj9NTzfkFKEQTTl4AaABAg.A8n7yU_O4CvA99Ji0buVoA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyXgMZoJErqHA8A1Wl4AaABAg.A8mo9DZH63vA8nB1WaR5Ps","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXzaPjnZ_kj2BGgtN4AaABAg.A8mm-R2YspiA8mpZH9mnCr","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgykXgym1KeB-7RMLyF4AaABAg.A1XxsQMDAIUA4TVn_-yAz-","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzD6MKMFQnxJNHBMh14AaABAg.A-ATpDVwFIcA-kR5f24ton","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzWUX19K3t2eSLHW14AaABAg.9wi8DnM4_lL9x8tP8IrJ8T","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyCyvMqaGecBKl6vVp4AaABAg.9vwpPY5AVMI9x8u4ucFvfa","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]