Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
How many truck drivers voted for trump and his AI bill to allow this? Im sure 10…
ytc_UgxpT-D8Y…
G
AI art has drifting issues as well and is still struggling to stay consistent, r…
ytr_UgzWjaqtv…
G
Its not funny, but between the irrate foreigners, scammers, bot calls bad custom…
ytc_Ugw67ZFb-…
G
AI takes existing information and regurgitates it. We humans can actually come u…
ytc_UgyqwBbTL…
G
In my opinion, truck drivers won’t just stand by without reacting — they have th…
ytc_UgyCijcVZ…
G
It would be hilarious if "AI" thought of this dumpster fire of an ad 😂…
ytc_UgzTrWc5x…
G
But there are too many people still trying to be a tailor in the new AI world. P…
ytr_UgyJsfYGB…
G
It will never completely replace manual human labor. AI & robotics still require…
ytr_UgwpWvipU…
Comment
@thewannabecritic7490 That's exactly what I feared before I started.
But no. Text 2 Image requires excellent use of language to produce something original. And there's a great deal of learning how the samplers and checkpoints react to each prompt. My input level is quite high, and why I think of it as a collaboration.
The first thing to know is generative AI doesn't just find an existing piece of art that's roughly in the ballpark, and copy that. It rarely does that. Especially if I'm trying to produce something original.
Photorealistic images of existing people might be the times it does reach for existing work to copy, but i discourage photorealism. I want AI to make the things that can't be photographed. Personally I'm obsessed with the 'painterly' side of things; trying to produce original classical-style portraits in my own style. By that I mean I completely opposed prompts containing "In the style of Rembrandt" or whoever.
THAT, imo, would be cheating. It would be copying Rembrandt's (or whoever's) flourishes, motifs, and possibly existing works.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-09-01T18:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxcfUpR29O5m2a3FyF4AaABAg.AMqRdFN9V7NAObDMdOIqfg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXZhkCuTObkmcpZep4AaABAg.AMjCNYX1upjAMoBJH27m9B","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXZhkCuTObkmcpZep4AaABAg.AMjCNYX1upjAMpGrJf5fPN","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXZhkCuTObkmcpZep4AaABAg.AMjCNYX1upjAMqoJYtwuh8","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxocgow7cE2vgQBmEh4AaABAg.AMfJqI1Z_D7AMilar-bRK1","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzCmTu1MSjvX6ZNF8x4AaABAg.AMb4TJCGTT5AMbfIQgh-KJ","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzCmTu1MSjvX6ZNF8x4AaABAg.AMb4TJCGTT5AMdPA-37jP_","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwbmAo8HK9k41T73p94AaABAg.AMSn1CxHxH-AMXxk7ikZYJ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwWM6xybMZD8ib7mB14AaABAg.AMKv1nHUgqWAMLo3s3dRBg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwLPBozLCWaoJ5zD8p4AaABAg.AM1pCnFk7liAM2H1bUNjvy","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]