Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The creators know that if AI compliments these users, they will continue to use …
ytc_UgwsNRIU6…
G
I'm a disabled artist. My disability is vision related with colorblindness in th…
ytc_UgyGxi-ij…
G
Five years ago that prompt wouldn't get an image at all. This is completely igno…
ytc_Ugx3oNeUw…
G
Gaslighting an AI to believe it is conscious, now that's what I call a good cont…
ytc_UgwTtQ8Em…
G
Good to now AI can’t replicate assholes yet, means I still got a job. (Disclaime…
ytc_Ugyj6Gtgf…
G
So much astroturfing here. I’ll never run AI from china on my device or send the…
rdc_m9hr42l
G
Dude's talking as if the ai gonna launch the nuclear nuke just because they can …
ytc_UgwGsb_77…
G
Artificial Intelligence is a contradiction of terms. Why would anyone wish to h…
ytc_Ugwn1VYzk…
Comment
I am much more curious in how AI increasing a radiologist’s efficiency will impact the supply and demand of radiologists. For ex. If normally it takes 10 radiologists to clear a typical days imaging workload. Will Radiologists+ AI increase efficiency so that the same work can be done with 6-7 radiologists? If so, why wouldn’t businesses employ AI to increase efficiency and cut overhead costs?
I think this is a much more reasonable role for AI in the short term because it doesn’t rely on the technology being perfect. Even if it can do simple things such as measurements or early alerts on potential findings, it could still drastically increase efficiency wouldn’t it?
Overall it seems this is better for patient care, decreasing inefficiency in the system. I guess the real question is whether the increase in radiologists efficiency with AI will outpace increased imaging demands. If that does happen, maybe groups can leverage the increased efficiency to expand coverage area, maybe by employing teleradiology?
What’re are your thoughts?
youtube
AI Jobs
2022-04-10T18:1…
♥ 7
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwoM1SVbDEvFaCDubV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyxW3wlWoZyCc0Wwt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZa9aFlB3JhtBhkVZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgziTpvc6ek5gO1kgbZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwEVPezAZlCAGfgfH54AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyh0D53sVQDmbAlnNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzzUL-cM88qnhHkCr54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzj6K1wdTf95bUC0G54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyB8WhuVM4o8cKni0d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3qj9FgyyaTWBwPb94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]