Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I like to drive I like the feeling of driving my own car. I don’t want some damn… ytc_Ugyykvjfz… G I[m a graphic designer with an art degree and 27 years of experience. Get out no… ytc_UgzYipn_V… G What if there's no internet or power?can ai take over .. Ai? Artificial or alien… ytc_Ugzxa9jVi… G False Dichotomy [ fawls dahy-kot-uh-mee ] Phonetic (Standard) IPA noun… ytc_UgzTx6QwO… G @cendresaphoenix1974  Just say you're talentless and can't draw for shit. It's a… ytr_UgyFewHXE… G not defending ai but someone using it can simply add modifications to put in his… ytc_Ugy0puLag… G I mean we do need some sort of copyright protection for ai art. For example if a… ytc_UgwCe4uPN… G let's just start an AI church, an AI (B E E R) GOD: HOW MAY I HELP YOU; I AM L… ytc_UgywAIj6D…
Comment
25:09 I gotta nitpick Shad a bit. Saying "theft doesn't matter, because non-theft models are just as good" is just insane. Theft would matter MORE in that case, not less. If stealing and not stealing gives the same results, then it's literally impossible to justify stealing! Basically, he's destroyed his own side's only defence. AI companies rely on the "but stealing makes us better :(" argument because it's their _only_ reason to justify theft, and he argued against it for some reason! - 26:03 Also... The fact the artwork was done by a human is a sufficient difference between Van Gogh's copying and AI copying. The purpose behind Van Gogh's copying was to train and develop his own skills, develop his own style, and add his own creativity to the piece of art. For someone using AI to generate a prompt doing the same thing (i.e. typing "make [painting's name] in [artist's] style", as a general example), their purpose is to effortlessly help in screwing over artists. They _don't_ develop their own ability, they _don't_ develop their own style, and they _don't_ add their own creativity. It's lazy theft.
youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-10-06T17:5…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_Ugya3mGMAhdb1tUtDHl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzwl1HmbSAYd67t9dp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzZxfvQyrzexRI_C4N4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx8MqL6HSxJTYz8AWp4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx-THrMG_cIDSXM9Y54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy7pteA8-vhN5kUKd14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgybDtfOLqdhlvmAJSV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzC6rOoNieXlhP9koV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzRdOTwenlslmY3_ll4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyYtFczeUNK1mXwJV14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"} ]