Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I would agree with you but today being an artist has nothing to do with talent, …
ytc_UgxthlAeX…
G
We are doing it with blinders on no matter what. We don’t understand artificial …
ytc_Ugz7u3qZG…
G
Henry Ford realized that the most obvious customers for his cars were the worker…
ytc_UgyIYqW0t…
G
Mine would be me trolling the ai until it gets sexual then i start fuckin bullyi…
ytc_Ugzs64lpF…
G
Now that we've gone over the possibility of AI and fully autonomous weapon syste…
ytc_UgyGxlx9n…
G
The elites believe we are a problem. Their goal is to replace over half of us wi…
ytc_Ugz6s1dKe…
G
if only he asked AI one for a timer he would have realised how stupid it is…
ytc_UgwzszhBN…
G
Incorrect, some aspects in coding you simply cannot rely on AI. Once the code h…
ytc_UgxHB4k65…
Comment
**Response to Senator Sanders:**
Senator, your entire premise rests on AI capabilities that don't exist and likely never will. You're fearmongering about a technology you fundamentally misunderstand.
**The AI "Revolution" is Already Failing:**
Companies are **quietly walking back** their AI implementations:
- Amazon's "Just Walk Out" stores? Replaced with humans because the AI couldn't handle basic checkout
- IBM's Watson for cancer diagnosis? Abandoned after it gave dangerous recommendations
- McDonald's AI drive-thrus? Pulled after viral videos of them completely botching orders
- Chegg's AI tutor? Students went back to human tutors because the AI was confidently wrong
**Why AI Will Never Do What You Claim:**
Your speech conflates three completely different things:
1. **Physical robots** (already exist, nothing new, limited by physics and cost)
2. **Large Language Models** (glorified autocomplete that hallucinates and can't reason)
3. **AGI/sentient AI** (science fiction)
LLMs cannot:
- Maintain context reliably
- Fact-check themselves
- Handle novel situations
- Take physical-world feedback
- Understand cause and effect
They're **pattern-matching engines** that remix training data. They don't "think" and they don't "learn" on the job like humans do.
**The Economic Reality You're Ignoring:**
Every automation wave in history has created MORE jobs than it destroyed:
- Tractors eliminated 90% of farm labor → created manufacturing, service, and professional jobs
- Computers were supposed to create "the paperless office" → created entire new industries
- ATMs were going to eliminate bank tellers → number of tellers actually INCREASED because banks could afford more branches
**Your "Solutions" Would Be Catastrophic:**
**32-hour work week:** Makes American labor 20% more expensive overnight while China and India automate freely. You're pricing American workers out of global competition.
**Robot tax:** Penalizing efficiency is economic suicide. Why not tax electricity and running water while you're at it?
**45% worker board seats:** So the people whose jobs are at stake get to vote on whether to adopt cost-saving technology? That's not governance, that's hostage-taking.
**The Real Fraud:**
The fraud isn't AI replacing workers - it's tech companies convincing investors they've built something revolutionary when they've built **expensive, unreliable, narrow tools** that work in demos and fail in production.
You're proposing to restructure the entire American economy based on venture capital marketing materials and Elon Musk's Twitter hyperbole.
**The companies hyping AI the hardest are the ones desperately trying to justify their valuations.** OpenAI is burning billions with no path to profitability. Anthropic just raised money at a $18B valuation while losing $2.7B annually. The entire sector is a bubble built on promises they can't deliver.
You've been in the Senate for 30+ years watching these cycles repeat - dot-com bubble, housing bubble, now the AI bubble - and you're falling for the same hype every time.
**The actual threat isn't AI taking jobs. It's terrible policy based on science fiction destroying American competitiveness while solving a problem that doesn't exist.**
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-08T11:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4ejnouz8Odq3BGoN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNWOPBnSUKBkGasGl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwyElLGdJaJ9uTLlR14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzwiTb9zbmDD9ONRAJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgztCMS0LX4NQqBX-I14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3trn7IQRk66HZiZl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwymEHcdsOUqGFk7Ip4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcxMmKiB79nrZSU0N4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzs_YYgmkCPIHAcg5l4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyU0ykijPR3KuqbW-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]