Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I’d sure like to hear first hand of entry-level jobs that are ‘replaced’ by AI. …
ytc_Ugxah11ea…
G
@monad_tcpThe AI is an excellent decision maker. Not fool proof though, so if it…
ytr_UgxZxhI-T…
G
great speech, historical. i agree with bernie on the attack on elites and ai, i …
ytc_UgwX_qnYU…
G
I didn't make it all the way through because it seems to devolve into just anoth…
ytc_Ugz8MAjyW…
G
Suchir Balaji (November 21, 1998 – November 26, 2024) was an American artificial…
ytc_UgxHkFArr…
G
How is this even considered a “debate”? The central issue at hand (AI posing an…
ytc_UgwHGK7BE…
G
Somewhere between growing up in a different era (I'm 60), having common sense, a…
ytc_UgwL_MZFp…
G
Use night shade PLEASE. Not only it protects ur art. It posions ai art so that i…
ytc_Ugxzq1WiX…
Comment
Yes, I'll be honest, as a consumer (not an artist), I couldn't care less about "art" and "artists" in the sense the author of this video is using. It's much more important to me to be able to quickly get the art I need, rather than hiring artists, waiting a month, and paying half my salary for some primitive social media art... but the author of the video clearly doesn't care about art consumers either, and their goal is to make money from the images they create, and AI is simply a more effective competitor in this field, am I not right? That's why most artists are outraged.
And the argument about plagiarism is certainly a whole other level... I'm just curious why no companies or artists are upset that other artists are creating memes and art featuring famous characters that's littered across the internet? And that's not copyright infringement (unless, of course, they sell the art). However, if someone generates the same art featuring a famous character using AI, that's an immediate copyright infringement. What's the logic?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-10-18T17:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugx1--Pckefwjce57NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9wjNpToarLoc_Q6R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzqPWtS9oSti0j8cwx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz13MYXfgH6X0CGOpN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxh7jBQIXEbTfeTOLp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3FYxh09g5X1dI2Nt4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzhqIyKsKx6aH3fNcJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwS6-rP2H_fNI-PcYx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzwCdMqwmHPVvBE25N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyQvfguEkHHRVpXZwB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}]