Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Which is cheaper? Bulletproofing your AI medical equipment or using AI to find w…
ytc_UgzWJRDDd…
G
Pathetic. Your lack of respect for the Secretary of War will be pointed out ever…
ytc_UgwSTS70a…
G
Chatgpt will fucl up the worlds, not just devs! Everything starts to be a mess!…
ytc_UgwKjfJJn…
G
Humans need a slogan .
Computer intelligence had been evolving since 1990.
It j…
ytc_Ugwk1D8uO…
G
i am 19 and i am trying to figure how i can use ai to get rich, i am not gonna b…
ytc_UgzFUvGrX…
G
Thank you for sharing this. I can tell you’ve put real thought and heart into yo…
ytc_Ugy9v3E4U…
G
Look, the issue is that you and people who use Nightshade have an IQ of around 1…
ytc_Ugzw3CroM…
G
He's the godfather of deep learning, which is modern AI, not the entire field of…
ytc_Ugzc1NNvh…
Comment
Very amusing discussion. Dr. Boghossian is struggling with two conflicting aims. On the one hand, he gave ChatGPT the task of defending the con-Dei position that he himself supports and would therefore like to see ChatGPT succeed. This is obvious when, in attempting to define diversity from the pro-Dei perspective, he defines Dei in part as excluding viewpoint diversity. I know of no defender of Dei who would explicitly state that part of the DEFINITION of Dei is the exclusion of viewpoint diversity. Why would the Dei defender strawman his own position?! Boghossian is clearly throwing ChatGPT a softball here. On the other hand, if ChatGPT were to succeed in refuting Boghossian's pro-Dei arguments, he might fear that it could reflect badly on his own competence as a critical thinker and debater. It is very entertaining to watch this. Dr. Boghossian has nicely placed himself between a rock and a hard place.
youtube
2024-06-05T15:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgyVDrwgz1-ZR5XPWOt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgzhRr39TZ2Nzdt4zIF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgwfCAUpJwQQAPpCBS54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgzBwTg9NRsXeMOn6MZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_Ugzn6iF2sVzEeWDP7S54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgxutcYbcAlqHRazwfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_Ugw0LB9BgPO4UatptZ54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgwGJMgzPKEJTnBM2HJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_Ugzn4-hWrqxSZslV5yl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},{"id":"ytc_Ugx86t3tTf7NZ3uAP4p4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]