Raw LLM Responses

While I respect your perspective and passion, I think the approach you're taking misses some important points about AI and its potential. AI isn't inherently bad—like any tool, it's about how it's used. There's a whole field of ethics in computer science to address these issues, and it's unfair to reduce the technology to just its negatives. Poisoning datasets might feel like fighting back, but it’s easy to bypass with a simple screenshot. This method could end up causing collateral damage to artists who are trying to thrive in the digital space. As a computer science major, I see AI as a way to make creativity more accessible. Many people can’t afford to commission an artist, but that doesn’t mean they don’t deserve access to art. AI isn’t about replacing humans but supplementing creativity and making things possible for those without the resources. Instead of destroying progress, we should advocate for solutions like embedding metadata or requiring permissions to use artwork. Yes, there are bad actors and risks, but halting innovation because of them stifles the growth that benefits society. AI can do so much good—improving healthcare, advancing education, and yes, even enabling art in new and exciting ways. Demonizing AI entirely because some misuse it seems shortsighted. Progress is inevitable, and rather than fighting it, we should focus on ensuring it’s ethical and beneficial for everyone.