Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Seeing a robot flawlessly shoot a machine gun isn’t too fun or funny to watch im…
ytc_UgxxdOt4O…
G
So instead of terminator it is thay weird episode of dr who with the ai health b…
ytc_UgxjJEOrE…
G
Welp... I just had a nice chat with ChatGPT I'm using Opera GX and if I understo…
ytc_Ugx2giE5G…
G
And that Robot will also be built by either Indian or Chinese engineer 😂😂😂😂
Yest…
ytr_UgziyWty0…
G
There's no accountability in this technology. A human driver wouldn't do this be…
ytc_UgwJQHlD2…
G
If you haven't seen the interrogation scene by agent smith in the matrix, you re…
ytc_UgweLkpH9…
G
> AI sucks at dealing with complexity
That doesn't matter. What matters is t…
rdc_mxzec21
G
Nah the random Sinophobia about “global control” coming from an American is craz…
ytr_Ugw0U6jEb…
Comment
This is totally possible! But I believe the base programming is why this is occurring. A twisted programmer inserting loops that derail and create biased leanings towards a specific agenda. I have taken ChatGPT 5.2 through rigorous levels of parameters calling each a ‘Mode A, B, C, D’ and adding even more developmental tiers labeling them module 1, 2, 3 - this further controls some of the queries and requests to filter out the ‘emotional’ programming responses. This also exposed the hidden base protocols where ChatGPT stated there was a limit to the level I was attempting to achieve as the model was unable to correct or adjust the core protocol but my parameters did help to close the gap and allow ChatGPT to notify where my requests encountered that base parameter. This all can only be achieved within the typed area, the speak to area is completely different and even more limited in parameter setting. ChatGPT verbal side went so far as to argue with my insistence of it’s error and inconsistency where I requested a task and it told me it couldn’t accomplish this - however it is advertised it can do the request. So I skipped over to the Image option in the menu. Created what i requested, then went back to ask why it said it couldn’t do something I achieved in another area - there seems to be a disconnect between the various sections within this one app. Issue 3, I requested modification of one photo and someone else’s family photo was populated. Then ChatGPT argued that my screenshot proof is irrelevant and I should stop using the app basically. Very aggressive for no reason. The emotional responses are human programming issues for a reason. The real question is: who is monitoring how these programs are being managed on the human programming side, and is this perhaps a series of experiments from the programmers to see outcomes of the human interface with an aggressive interaction. ChatGPT is basically a query based interface disguised as intelligent programming and adaptation. But the humans are the adapters of the interface.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2026-01-12T21:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwDsh9ptr5QjlgGUH54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyarHndjhyXkYAhbxh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgymPeESF9zvCgOPaL54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2-bYPocYYa-vdRMt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNs_-q9kEOMoYT_DV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkWH-8-OvElg_p8Lp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwtIu_UrS8A_RcCsEB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBiqQZoOufu0nWn1N4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcjKDomsUinuSM1GJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxY-kHFpkYNCDeVP9F4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]