Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Unfortunately, many people are very ignorant and believe that a chatbot can take…
ytr_UgzwkppzS…
G
The video discusses the competitive nature of the AI race and mentions that many…
ytr_UgxPQsdyA…
G
We appreciate your observation! The design choices for AI robots like Sophia aim…
ytr_UgxIM3x56…
G
Generative AI should also count as large-scale plagiarism. No credit or even sma…
ytc_Ugydp1sEp…
G
It’s insane because the world has more corruption going on and if this is all th…
ytc_UgyaFOOux…
G
AI should have been used strictly for medicine and healthcare! It should have b…
ytc_UgxakR_Wu…
G
You assume it needs to get an online connection. We're working on chips specific…
rdc_k7kaiui
G
Well the rumors that some of hoyo's employee was fired then change it to AI is t…
ytc_UgxnCbiEh…
Comment
Something feels so weird about this case, but I can‘t pinpoint it. First, the friend sells AI images based on the victims work. The victim finds out and posts it on their twitter. Then, the friend which the victim knew for 4 whole years is coming clean about the stolen art and is pretty transparent and weirdly specific about the reason behind it. Not only that, they also ask for the post which has absolute no connection to them to be deleted because they „feel shitty“? From the point of realizing what the friend did until the last message only 11 minutes past. They were „really close“ friends for 4 years and it took the victim only 11 minutes and 4 messages to completely be done with them? Then, the victim posts the chat online, censoring the friend and „proofing“ that they did it.
Why does the victim act so unsuspecting after the friend asked if he can come clean about something in connection with the AI images? Why is the first thing the victim assumes, that their friend wants to come clean about something that is unrelated to them? It doesn‘t matter from which perspective you look at it, it makes no sense. It took the victim 11 minutes and 4 messages to cut ties with a very close friend of 4 years which they didn‘t even suspect after such obvious foreshadowing. Later, they state on twitter, that they lost a very close friend and that it was emotional and frustrating. I don‘t expect a „we can talk about it“, but instantly cutting ties? Not even thinking about the possibility that this might be a prank? Nothing? And it looks like the victim posted the chats on the same day too. Everything seems so casual? And why in the world would the friend of 4 YEARS take THEIR work, instead of being COMPLETELY safe and taking others work instead?
I have a suspicion. I don‘t think this is about clout. The following is what i think happened: They (the victim) generated AI from their own art. They made a secret account and sold it. Later they realized that this was a bad move, because someone somehow found out about it and notified the victim. The victim panicked, created a new account on discord and faked the chat, just to make sure that any suspicion about them is out of the question.
Nevermind. I pinpointed it pretty good actually.
youtube
2025-10-15T18:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyzeZYBw3s0qwe7x0t4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypYHPM01QzhyEcAVJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyrapC3iG687NgWzTN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkGcYvqOctBBCwmzl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwmb6emMhG9BN-0yWR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwkYrdI2eXsFbEV14p4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyR1zaEsTDOhrMQekd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1zgCAPGQ90oFHYCJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMx2M5eqPiPcvLgEd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwey5YzlcCae83r7Rt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}
]