Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I sense some admiration of Sam from the lady when she speaks about his accomplis… ytc_Ugy0Xnvyc… G What everyone who discusses this serious issue never mentions is that it’s not s… ytc_UgzNB0oMe… G Guys, you don't get it. If you restrict AI access to data, creators of these AI … ytc_Ugx17AFMa… G Democrats should take opportunity of that hearing to expose the AI-powered attac… ytc_Ugy4qoyBt… G We have to teach ethics to AI ,but who wants to kill itself 😂if it is same as hu… ytc_UgwA7h73M… G Ai excuses Lying, Stealing and Cheating. Photography does not do this. Analytic… ytc_Ugz6zESBX… G We should make the AI not see color, so it can't distinguish if a person is blac… ytc_UgzhEwkrk… G AI gives 100% correct solutions for the problems that have already been sold on … ytr_Ugxdd1wSi…
Comment
What I find surprisingly lacking in discussions like these is proper representation of social sciences in the panel, be it sociologists, historians, political scientists (etc). If the goal is to talk about AI and technology's impact on our future, and therefore by definition about societies, cultures, people, locally and globally, then I'd expect to see some experts of such fields included into the discussion, because that is their field of expertise, unlike with non-social science experts. It'd be wise to include some computational/IT experts to benefit from their expertise into understanding the technology itself (however so often they seem lacking and ill-advised when it comes to social matters and the technology's impact on peoples and their societies), but it seems wild, nonsensical if not sometimes cynical to me that the other way around social scientists are so very often categorically and systemically excluded on matters that relate to THEIR fields of expertise, while non-experts often talk so confidently on social matters they don't actually have much expertise in.
youtube AI Governance 2026-04-05T12:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningcontractualist
Policynone
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgwZyB8kadifiA5VOKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyuXF-ZWdfxIGTZpqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxaIa4fEwEzdI2s9zd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx43kDpw1e7XXqgyMt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzj9PJuBEeifooeqFt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyrdosCanqs7tT0YON4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy1gpYcngcXLWCMFP94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwxtRtaQzrEzEbkwAh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzBCZUWleatLTwB9HN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwtpYsUBVrfpiZnz8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"} ]