Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I’ve never met a single artist who was good at it from the start. I know I sure …
ytc_UgyPNpq8e…
G
Too bad, you changed your music format. One of the most entertaining aspects of…
ytc_UgzA3HCuN…
G
If I may offer a qualification or two... if one cannot define life in the univer…
ytc_UgxtDoKI5…
G
Ask AI who is the most corrupt and what can we do to prosecute them. Then ask AI…
ytc_Ugxl-vJJw…
G
Why a woman and who does "she" have boobs? It seems most "hyper realistic" creat…
ytc_UgzQM14y6…
G
As a disabled artist (classic ehlers danlos and POTS)
It being easier for disabl…
ytc_UgykeHZyb…
G
If people wanna “ban AI” then you might as well start with your phones and other…
ytc_UgwGanWZA…
G
It won't be a petty civil matter if op brings in a lawyer but whatevs.…
rdc_dya68xt
Comment
Letting tech giants in the A.I. industry - who all have dubious safety/ethical records with A.I. and all want the same end goal of A.I. profit - "safety check" each other's models sounds like a recipe for Skynet. Even if their safety standards and biases weren't an issue, the problem is that even if these companies are competitors, they can only succeed if A.I. is accepted and used by the public on a huge scale, so helping A.I. seem safer benefits both sides. It's a Nash Equilibrium where they both benefit the most if they don't try to drag each other down with bad safety checks.
...who thought this up, the FAA?
youtube
2026-04-10T15:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgydsObKgWJzks654EN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5MnejrGSbsruraBp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzSKJ26vaEOaA8Jw0d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx4SXVsDWX27-pPXkR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNR7QnmSlDJXiQn6h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxuugFx3yJzEWXRwF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX5qqxJAtYwmi2N4R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3uAY5bKrr9M91PB14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgpaoBeFt8SveWsF14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYNiQ3TxczR-tT8Kt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]