Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Anyone who’s read history knows this is bs. For labor disruption read deth. I’m …
ytc_Ugy1OJgkA…
G
People worry that AI will takeover and we will all have to work for robots. Hone…
rdc_kvuw9jk
G
The funniest part about robot technology is the first thing man will design them…
ytc_Ugyln3kyv…
G
So her attacking Macron wasn't pushing an agenda considering Macron should be co…
rdc_fapj0yl
G
This guy has a robot as a wife in his basement. Full basement. Whole dang house …
ytc_UgyvfoN3V…
G
It seems to cause the similar fear when the last industrial revolution was comin…
ytc_Ugz7zwhyR…
G
The issue is those laws are too strict to begin sithn(they hurt individual peopl…
ytr_Ugxgnf5JD…
G
I think his point is that there was an anti AI protest a couple weeks ago and ab…
ytr_UgxuhLuKV…
Comment
The woman never saw the car coming because it was driving in "Autonomous Mode" with the headlights *OFF*.
How then to explain what you see in the video? Here's a neat trick. Take your TV/Stereo/whatever remote, look directly at the LED in the end of it and press any button. What do you see? Nothing, because the human eye can't detect the infrared beam. Now, take any digital camera, (most cell phones will work except iPhones - I don't know why). Look at the led through the view window on the camera and press the button again. What do you see? The digital camera "sees" the infrared and interprets it as a white light to your eye, *just like the digital camera that took the video of the accident*. What you see in the video is the infrared scan that the CAR SAW, not the driver, nor the woman crossing the street because the headlights were turned off. Notice there are no "Hot Spots" in the scan such as you would get from two separate headlight beams, just a "stripe" in front of the road.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2018-05-24T06:3…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzZSnnfj59UOcWUNUd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMUqIxyPPq82ZPwH14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgznW18G3AMIE_uCDFB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwtM4pOivcujKaP98B4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXlsYlR39y7k7YXLl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0LPFwCBLHB8OSH4d4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxKr-UyshtI6A1hDOd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxKQZ3qrwjF4MfFJGl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzBsJ6NOsaDQOsdEPx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw6xrdTx1uwcPo-yZ14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"}
]