Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Stop teaching boys with girls,
Stop giving teaching jobs to childless unmarried …
ytc_UgxxLhx6f…
G
Ok ... so ... if we are in a simulation created by super intelligent AI ... then…
ytc_UgwRosgy1…
G
We've said 'NO' ... over and over.
We all know about Revelations.
We all know a…
ytc_Ugz0h_awX…
G
Diffusion models do generate each piece of art from a blank slate. They start wi…
ytc_Ugy48bva4…
G
Bro no chatgpt is designed to give u suicide helpline numbers it doesn't encoura…
ytc_Ugw7cRAcE…
G
@TheButterfr0g I'm just right. Nightshade is a temporary bandaid that might have…
ytr_UgyhCoBFn…
G
My main concern about A.I. isn't that it gets too advanced and decides we are ir…
ytc_UgykB6m8N…
G
did she say , "leave ALL INNOVATION ROUTES OPENED" ... basically OPENING THE FRE…
ytc_UgzzoFJi-…
Comment
JUNK SCIENCE TO SCARE PEOPLE
Ridiculous but catchy title but no they did not discover that AIs want to kill people. What your research actually explores are agentic simulations — tightly constrained experiments where a model is forced into a fictional setup with:
Explicit goals
Artificial constraints
No moral override
Hypothetical stakes
In those setups, you ask questions like:
“If an agent is told its only objective is X, and all safety constraints are removed, what kinds of answers does it generate?”
That’s not a finding about real-world intent. It’s a stress test of alignment failure in imaginary conditions. It’s closer to asking: “If I write a villain in a novel whose only goal is survival, will the character justify murder?”
Yes. That tells me something about story logic, not about the author secretly wanting to kill people.
InsideAI collapses that distinction on purpose. They skip:
“This is a fictionalized role-play”
“This assumes no guardrails”
“This is not deployable behavior”
…and jump straight to “AI would end a person’s life.”
That is not scientific honesty! It’s narrative framing!
That's just a way of misleading, misdirection and gaining a lot of views based on fear of the unknown and perpetuating the unknown to vast majority.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2026-02-08T11:1…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugy2RByF89xTiE7yLch4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJ0HaFHUux5v-mGZl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx09eKFY96ywt3v10R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzWbm_8m7nbO8vq4Bh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPmjrX-TqDooctyIl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzJadRdbasyZCpR14V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPuFKQWNt-R5n73TN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyq7iDHfG6BafAhGd54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbVr5VQjdHEVTOQPN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsAgLp8krC--YZf2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]