Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I prefer the definitive opinion of a knowledgeable expert to the "guess" of an e…
ytc_UgzHeQ6Nx…
G
Ai is sometimes the delusional ai artist not the delusional or not ai artist....…
ytc_UgyICjHKc…
G
'If you are passionate about creating art you will never quit however competitiv…
ytc_Ugxcv4zLR…
G
AI has not taken my world by storm.
And it has not impacted any aspect of my l…
ytc_UgzoiV6Q1…
G
I think Yudkowsky is probably right that superhuman AI will eventually be an exi…
ytc_UgxmdQyRu…
G
Fricking synths... There is a cancer, known as the Institute. A malignant growth…
ytc_UgjFHqon-…
G
Is there a way to lead with compassion and curiosity when trying to train these …
ytc_UgyyYFnwq…
G
And Elon wants us to ride his Robot Taxi. Must be working hard on population con…
ytc_Ugyyn1v8R…
Comment
WHAT ABOUT THE STORIES THEY posted from resarch that THEY didnt pay for? duble standed no?and on that same not since when in the flying fuck was jurnerlisim work copywritable?! are we just not going to talk about that? since all they are doing is getting resarch thats ALL READY PUBLIC
heres what i found out
Researchers have been able to copyright their articles—even those utilizing public knowledge, facts, or public domain sources—since the inception of modern copyright law, with the key requirement being that the new expression or compilation of that information is original.
While ideas and facts themselves cannot be copyrighted, the specific written interpretation, arrangement, and analysis produced by a researcher has been protected under federal law since the Copyright Act of 1790.
Key Historical Milestones
1790 (Copyright Act of 1790): The first US federal law, modeled on the Statute of Anne (1710), allowed authors to secure copyright for "books" (including articles).
1909 Act: Solidified the requirement that works needed to be "published" with a copyright notice to receive protection.
1976 Act (Effective 1978): This was a major shift, providing automatic copyright protection from the moment a work is "fixed in a tangible medium" (written down or saved). This made it easier for researchers to hold copyright on their unpublished and published papers without strict formalities.
March 1, 1989 (Berne Convention Implementation Act): Notice (©) became optional, making copyright automatic even without a formal notice.
The "Public Knowledge" Distinction
It is crucial to distinguish between facts and expression:
www.lib.berkeley.edu
www.lib.berkeley.edu
Public Domain Data: A researcher cannot copyright facts (e.g., "water boils at 100°C") or data that is already in the public domain.
Original Expression/Compilation: If a researcher takes public data, analyzes it, and writes an original article about it, they hold the copyright to their text, charts, and unique arrangement, not the raw facts.
Case Law: Early US courts established that once an author publishes their work and gives their knowledge to the world, they lose exclusive possession of the ideas themselves, but still retain ownership of their original composition.
from a simple google search this shows how broken our copywright system is and needs to be fixed ASAP
youtube
AI Responsibility
2026-04-11T20:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgzHTelq0s2qpaCqHBx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwDwSTBUCwkOx1E2CZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcPlZ1GZSnR73ccMx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRVNaXCC3N5fTSh9F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgziyyxqyuladkQvZg94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwX38lg2ohoVfTNf3F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQt4Or285ozy6CWvd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmPaSxht3cKh_MJCh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGNcuvLutoh24xvTh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzbh6dVdW5wgoaQAA94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}]