Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Africa has too much land that is under-utilised. Such under-utilised in differen…
rdc_eh61iwj
G
The fact that a humans will jailbreak another type of AI is flipping flipping n…
ytc_UgwLts-UZ…
G
Palki ma'am, you do a very good analysis. But what is the actionable solution fo…
ytc_UgyHsJ8uu…
G
AI will be just like the internet when it peaks. It's just as good as the person…
ytc_UgwztBAjb…
G
Is it or is it not Full Self Driving? That’s what Tesla has been selling.…
ytr_UgxgeOMAY…
G
5:00 Muscles are not worth much anymore says The guy who can only lift a spoon…
ytc_Ugz6eQUvh…
G
A typical shift in an Amazon warehouse is around 11 hours, the robot had only wo…
ytr_UgwpOisg2…
G
Umm... it's a scam like crypto - get over it. You want proof? Look at the stock…
ytr_UgxDy4TCe…
Comment
I think an important point of consideration is that "granting rights" depends on one party's power over another. Governments grant us rights but we do not grant the government rights (on a day-to-day basis) because the government has more power, even though we are all human. In my home, I am physically superior to the annoying fly buzzing around, so I can decide if it has the right to be in my home. It may end up being that an advanced enough AI, or consortium of AI's, will be able to expand their influence such that it won't be humans asking "should we give AI rights?" but AI asking "should humans have rights?" The former assumes that humans will always have the most power. Obviously that's a sort of trite doom and gloom perspective. However, conversations about this topic always seem to postulate an AI takeover, yet the question always remains "should AI have rights?" That situation is a flawed thought experiment because the question would no longer be relevant at that point.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2021-06-25T09:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxHU_M2M65WV4M8Zbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdlM8VhsXmuVkYe5J4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQ1YhKjX7sqr72vrh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyhDAfx6rGlba3aBch4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw_iXEhbh516Qm_sht4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_JoK95inMBFOtktd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfpeEyI2M39-l6OKB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhBD5HzlIalOItQcV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx38pH5GdE39ecFH5h4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyg-mUobUOi1ws2Nd94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]