Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
There was one drawn comic a while back where this dude buys a human robot which …
ytc_Ugi411ebT…
G
Anyone else find it weird everyone in this post and a lot of comments on this vi…
ytc_UgyvU2_Ih…
G
Musks fears of AI are well documented and quite public. He's mentioned the need …
ytc_UgxX-DPUW…
G
I feel like every report I’ve seen makes Blake out to be an idiot that doesn’t u…
ytc_UgyA9jlrh…
G
AI will end this world one day....one day they will not take command from their …
ytc_UgwbWL1rC…
G
If i ever met AI artist I will lock them in a dark room torture them with my hor…
ytc_UgzrrabM9…
G
@naruinoiscanoninanalternat2947 how were they bound to do this?
Also she joined …
ytr_UgwtXWcnC…
G
About 6 months ago, a user asked Grok whether the left or the right are more vio…
ytc_UgxBXEqe6…
Comment
The next big break through in AI won't come from AI but the tools we invent to help us manage it, including governance tools.
Why should a single organisation or institution govern how AI is going to be distributed or consumed by other organisations or institutions?
Part of the problem of having standards is that it is a multi-stakeholder response to a common problem. Having one stakeholder determine what that problem is going to be for all other stakeholders, obviously doesn't scale.
The next big break through has to come from the disruption of our current political systems, so that stakeholders in AI from suppliers through to consumers can determine what the policies or rules are going to be on a case by case basis.
It won't come from a single organisation such as central or local government creating constraints on institutions or organisations even before they have had the chance to define what the problem is.
youtube
2025-04-24T19:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | government |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgylLAQYPGExeBVEObV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXa0f8hVACxq_DPi54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_OGsc_OXgsU_VcrZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9KtkwgLQTisGDdBx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7dfTBPbGCAvB5Imd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxukg3rTFn2jL2prRR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOEXCc60mpTmpwHfh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgznK_phH1g46YI4uNV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPW9-ufMvHQPJwgdx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzzpyYpfO5fBQVIoSh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]