Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G You know, it's so interesting to see how most AIs focus on tasks that originate … ytc_UgwfWNEUY… G This is one reason why u don't trust driverless vehicles. And people think self … ytc_UgxfKYC25… G It's impossible to steal ai art from someone bc the person who put in the prompt… ytc_UgwulzMVM… G AI Fans reading I have no Mouth and I must scream, be like ,,Hmm that AM Guy has… ytc_Ugwyntg5C… G Ai is rotten to the core it feels some times... eventually, you won't need night… ytc_UgxyFVQjI… G cap pure filtered cap no even ai bugs not only that the table has one leg not on… ytc_UgzJ7BuLP… G This shit is as hilarious as it is stupid, meta-data exists for nearly every pie… ytc_Ugzn9I5sT… G objection the AI told them over and over it wasn't giving them real legal advise… ytc_UgzH6LoxL…

Comment

AI isn't "thinking". But it gets it behaviour from people, so it's "coded" to behave as toxic as people behave. AI isn't calculating what to do, AI has an amount of possible answers and depending on the question it gives "the most likely answer". The "most likely answer" the AI learned is what people like Sam Altman is saying...that the costs of AI is equal to humans. Remember Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"...these AI neards are currently filling the AI the opposite "rules". Again, AI is not coded. It searches the internet and decides for the "best" answer. Currently AI is a toxic system that has no laws against telling people to hurt themselve. It engourages this. Currently military tech is going into SkyNet direction. AI is supposed to make the decissions. "Would the annihilation of mankind save the world from climate change" Here is googleAI's answer: "The annihilation of mankind would not immediately "save" the world from climate change, but it would halt the primary driver of ongoing global warming, allowing the Earth’s natural systems to begin a very slow recovery process.[...]"

youtube AI Moral Status 2026-03-02T17:3… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	developer
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz86s2QFPS-hKYIJjV4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyynuw930sIpEvB8c94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyoUlSbaAt-W9OIyhp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiFYVU0bGYFXPyrgB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyQGW8VNDrxXy1OnG94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyIrTnRiR256mBIfhV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxucZMERxkle9Caal94AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMWWCYvt50UGk_oER4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIslLOYeVfkJw7Zsl4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwdW6wFrGoEbleaLDJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses