Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It's interesting how it was first the race to the moon and now AI. hhm....…
ytc_Ugyokl80I…
G
Video is only applicable to IT sector. There are many jobs markets, AI can never…
ytc_UgxKf5Ab-…
G
GDB has been the kind that moved fast and broke things, caring not about the con…
ytc_UgzTXZ-n1…
G
@disorderandregression9278 It's just that in this case, it's unclear why there'…
ytr_UgzqPWtS9…
G
You know there's an issue when the guy credited w beginning machine learning and…
ytc_UgwzMMkvF…
G
Aliens will not allow rogue AI into space. They will switch off electricity supp…
ytc_UgyWbN3rK…
G
Ai will destroy this country. It cant spell can't pronounce words correctly and …
ytc_Ugw8Ge8aD…
G
Maybe watch where you drive even with ai ? Even tesla need more driving data , a…
ytc_UgwXyvANT…
Comment
I think a better solution to opting in is putting requirements on companies once they reach a certain level of popularity to ensure that exact replicas can't be made and that it can only use artist styles. Also require every image to have an immutable metatag that people can verify if its human or AI made. And, of course, any reasonable attempt to impersonate the artist by making a replica website would face legal consequences, though I'm pretty sure that's already against the law.
The problem with opting in is that without good data, ai will be useless and since most artists probably wouldn't opt in, they'd be too lousy and would essentially kill ai.
If you require tags and backend work to ensure it only references styles, which many actually do, then I don't see how artist and AI can't co-exist. It'll actually make real art more valuable if we're inundated with cheap art and real art is rare.
Right now, we're at the beginning stages
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2023-01-02T02:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwa4VEukX4cByGvRPB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwuNK9I_E7ngXyKkIV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzM5jHrIiW6lx9G1U54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjwvRhUvCRJDlVz-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfDajNifY2z-e7T7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_22SqniYXfwuIJXR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzF5LiB0YhXAJmdyJ94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypGkdvvy8qWKMvo614AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoRlOlslrCx9I6Zul4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaPGNt4Z9Q46PtLW54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]