Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Nobody programs Ai thats the problem that Yudkosky is exposing ....Wolfram doesn…
ytr_UgyF6c5Xm…
G
Elon now needs to buy and mess up all AI reaserch platforms like he did twitter.…
ytc_UgxOBFpO_…
G
I didn’t use AI during high school (before Jun 2024), literally 3 months later I…
ytc_UgxAPURRa…
G
im trying to become an artist over the summer(mainly because I suck at it) and e…
ytc_UgzM3YMqx…
G
Have you seen the ai videos of someone spreading random small versions thinking …
ytc_Ugzj9MyMH…
G
I just feel that self driving cars are a ridiculously crazy idea. Sad this woma…
ytc_Ugx3CLHR1…
G
A weakened US, economically and culturally, is actually probably beneficial for …
rdc_e2w1213
G
Why n the world would people invent sum like this anyway this is a bad idea very…
ytc_UgyZKGFkR…
Comment
Surprised that no one here is addressing the massive ecological costs of AI—its energy demand, resource extraction, and e‑waste—which are already accelerating climate impacts. Framing AI as a simple “horses to cars” style transition ignores the very real difference: our planet’s ecological limits. Technosolutionism assumes society can always adapt, but oversimplifying like this risks greenwashing the scale of the problem.
Would be truly interested to hear how someone with Neil deGrasse Tyson’s scientific rigor or Hasan Minhaj’s investigative lens weighs these environmental costs—not just the economic disruption. Isn’t it essential, especially in public conversations about the future, to confront whether the benefits of AI outweigh the risks to planetary health, and what kind of oversight or systemic change might actually be required?
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-08-26T13:2…
♥ 151
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzAA3MC9UcR8jr_FtZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzqrdEU7lnWriTJTU54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz14A5rJAd1rOvAHV14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzIqRqsQc7pWE-Jjm54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQn-egPg5wOhWauQZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPz9KI3h17pYu0WdF4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxKcsUwARd95Gs0i_Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy-vtJL40aMP04gScR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzk2oRTji4A3edi4At4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRaPUVzGqpDhZ9ytZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]