Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
your voice is so soft and soothing I would choose your drawings over ai and I ho…
ytc_Ugzg-v7EL…
G
Oh, yeah, can never get enough of those AI (Another Idiotic) Driverless Waymo on…
ytc_Ugx7Heiwz…
G
"You're all going to die. You have 2 years left. Any questions? ...how do I lubr…
ytc_UgyL9xTkw…
G
Anyone saying drawing digitally is the same as AI art is either ignorant or trol…
ytc_UgxzKnLhH…
G
This challenge is proof that AI could never look remotely as good as REAL art❤…
ytc_UgwBHfR83…
G
I never knew there was such a smart human that taught they could win a fight aga…
ytc_UgztaTLue…
G
@mignotmaxime2409 comme les romains qui subsistaient grâce à l'esclavage ? Dans…
ytr_UgzV9bSpL…
G
Like Linus Trovalds ( creator of Linux) we will know actual impact of AI only af…
rdc_n7p17cw
Comment
What's the essential difference between hiring a person to create artwork for you versus using AI to generate it? Does the origin of the artwork—whether created by a human, AI, or a combination of both—fundamentally matter?
When considering human-AI collaboration in art, particularly when redesigning original work, several questions arise. From my perspective, using AI seems acceptable because you're still providing the creative direction and human input. This is especially practical for time-consuming aspects like colorizing a sketch or drawing, where AI can enhance your work while you maintain creative control.
This creates a form of human-AI hybrid artistry, but it leads to another question: If hiring another person to execute your artistic vision means you're no longer considered the artist, does using AI tools result in the same loss of authorship? What's the distinction between these two approaches to outsourcing artistic execution?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-09-08T00:3…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxdL_R0sMZXjFkrgR14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCqX3B8DnG_mM8ITp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxYl-UjLrN1NF5AKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMev2AzxUe0Me88uZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYDtd_xjjK2fCfdg54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwsz30BjDLkLarwU4V4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGlHnjIll1Fgf9yLx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxqTO6cDdE3KhWLNmR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw72FS98X_vCQsST8J4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVA5nk87YoA1o0wTd4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]