Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Guys I’m slow, what does she mean by “poisoned” does that mean that like, the ar…
ytc_UgwtjGrb9…
G
My dentist uses AI to interpret x-ray pictures of teeth and I am actually quite …
ytc_UgzvghhpE…
G
Someone once told me one of my paintings (in real life, in acrylic on canvas!) l…
ytc_UgzhM_-1R…
G
When someone calls an AI their “best friend” or “girlfriend,” they’re using huma…
ytc_Ugx6M5mYz…
G
26:06 — What if they stop, but other nations like North Korea, China, and Russia…
ytc_Ugwaw-Tim…
G
what if anyone could prove (research) Evidence AI tried to take over. or that it…
ytc_UgzAxKUJb…
G
I see a few different potential futures with all this.
1. AI takes or is given f…
ytc_Ugx0NDcsA…
G
@psydart5945 How can you personally make that argument when you are making it in…
ytr_Ugx2OY0gx…
Comment
You know, I think you maybe changed my mind on this debate. It's reasonable to ask artists if they want to opt in, and pay them for material used to train the AI.
AI artists currently get around the claim of 'copyright infringement' by doing stuff 'in the style of' specific artists. Like you can generate a "Sam-like" image and say "these eyes weren't directly lifted from any image by Sam", or "this background isn't the same as any specific background he made". And I used to think like that... "well, since it's not directly copied, the artist can't claim any ownership and therefore deserves nothing".
But those eyes and background wouldn't exist without Sam's input images, and those are supposed to be protected, and someone else is getting paid based on those protected input materials. So whether it's a 100% copy or not, I think legally it would fall under a "derivative work".
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-27T20:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2TDQZTmoPc9vpMwR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxN1pHP7NGMUKybBjF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXj7p7RhnlW1eHXp94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzHXXqsnV1bZ2rwhEd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBApA_QUi0tIlmCxF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8NAIy7LxWRjmJxlR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7U7MD0isrJVPm2NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyHiWNJWf0SmbVU50h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz89u1yEbuRTgpZbr54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTwTs8omt-Au_DBkl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]