Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Keep at it! I know it can be discouraging but I encourage you to try new things …
rdc_latzxhz
G
because it inherently has no meaning - in human-made art, every brushstroke, eve…
ytr_UgzAmfpNl…
G
AI IS GOING TO DESTROY THE HUMANS ON THE PLANET,,,THAT IS A GOOD THING THE PLANE…
ytc_UgyZC0pGw…
G
My first thoughts starting reading the sentence was it was shut down because it …
rdc_mwvj3pk
G
I understand what you are saying, but I think this is the first time in history …
ytc_UgyHOX0cX…
G
@alexdavidson7498 The concept is the exact same. In google, you type in what ima…
ytr_UgyDTQNaF…
G
Wake up people. No. Kids should not be learning to code the way we have up until…
ytc_Ugz6B8NDI…
G
People can turn my art into ai generated stuff. But when the results are dull an…
ytc_UgxFDxsAk…
Comment
Senator Sanders, I really appreciate your concern about AI and automation, and I agree we need to make sure these technologies benefit everyone. That said, I think focusing mostly on the working class misses a bigger picture. AI isn’t just replacing factory or fast-food jobs it’s starting to affect middle-class office jobs, professional work, and even creative fields. Meanwhile, jobs that rely on physical labor or hands-on skills may actually stick around longer than we think.
There’s also a major economic question your speech doesn’t really touch on: if AI replaces a huge chunk of the workforce, who’s going to have the money to buy the things it produces? Without some way to keep people’s income flowing like universal basic income, profit sharing, or something similar mass automation could end up hurting the economy instead of helping it.
The threat of AI is real, but it’s more complicated than just being a “working-class issue.” We need policies that consider the whole workforce and make sure people can still participate in the economy.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-08T03:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqhHhvLIrij4QjC7x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVmmTkPXui6HZNYpB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_UMewRrLLCYhXBWV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3WGauMU8jShADdad4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeaFed62-uZhaVqbJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxun4k30lkDtHQB8n14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7RF5T8s_iDk8oZV54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3ZjgnSvlvKnqT2DF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyD1Ae4TrJ0tyTFlih4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-DaSCpEipLa9v5EN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]