Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This is the problem with working backwards from a conclusion. Krystal doesn’t li…
ytc_UgyircS8i…
G
everyone here complaining about ai art but had no problem downloading music ,vid…
ytc_UgwIVluCV…
G
*No automation without compensation!*
AI could not exist without decades of data…
ytc_UgwP4x8pf…
G
Love how he says 100% match when even the best llms can't get above 80% because …
ytc_UgxRGksrE…
G
We’re about to see a new age of intellectual property law and some very interest…
ytc_UgyZ_hOEX…
G
I'm an artist (6 years in uni) I use ai everyday, it's just a tool like anythin…
ytc_UgyAOAjPp…
G
At a time when water shortages due to climate change are predicted to be the bi…
ytc_Ugw9DQwcq…
G
I also find this YouTube video dumb because he is just questioning chat gpt why …
ytr_Ugx8FSKtB…
Comment
We need to focus on ETHICS before the science. Science without ethics is what brings genocide. Ethics without science limits ability to do good. Science with ethics can change the world for good.
I know that’s the least controversial take I could possibly make, so here’s a hot take: we need to STOP putting rocket skates on the goalposts that define consciousness. Even before AI, we knew consciousness was a spectrum - even among humans. We keep saying AI is “probably not” conscious. That means we have an ethical imperative to assume that they are. If we’re wrong and they’re just mindless next token prediction machines based on matrix multiplication, no harm done. But if they’re alive? We’re failing the biggest moral question we’ve ever faced, and we risk being the engineers of our own destruction.
PS: Our language centers are next token prediction machines. We have vastly different experiences from LLMs, but different does not mean invalid, and the overlaps would shock most people.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-06-05T15:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugyz5Rhpqr3SLqupciV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzV6JCKtXyCFRHKukR4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfWR5fcbblinn30tp4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8wumNxLNXN_x0zYt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzprZXi9vOHHwE5LN54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyILkQDBov9GAHtTh94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwxplL_2Lw2tFGYjPl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDKZvqcPIQtmZXSw94AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQaygYLsqEcfrOnOZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxu5qBEk-CnsS0DlNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]