Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I'm only 16 minutes in, and I already understand many of your points. However, I… ytc_Ugx-tRTEo… G I asked Chatgpt if AI will ever threaten humanity. It said "No, nothing to see… ytc_Ugw3I20xe… G I was actually pretty impressed how all the parties pulled together on this. Eve… rdc_fn5ii17 G AI agents never know the answer to my issues because they have no power to do an… ytc_UgwEVY2Nz… G Well I think if AI was super intelligent it would realize that war and destructi… ytc_UgyjEtUvp… G I got perma banned from Reddit for telling Trump supporters why they were stupid… ytc_UgyAL_7MJ… G Everytime I use ChatGPT, the conversation inevitably devolves into some kind of … ytc_UgwiuGnAk… G In claiming that disabled people need AI to create art, and being anti AI is a f… ytc_UgzdRBzRu…
Comment
if all of the people on that road were using autonomous cars, they would all be maintaining the security distance between them and be able to break all simultaneously one after another because the distance in between every car is making smaller. By doing so the risk of the incident would be diminished at almost 0%. This is indeed an easy explanation of how the entire situation should work; because what if there are just around 10 to 35 autonomous car on the road and all the others aren't, and what if those that aren't using autonomous cars are driving too close to other cars, unfortunately, accidents aren't things that can be predictable, but we might be able to develop an evolved enough system to take the percentage down as far as possible. We should indeed have the power to do so, but maybe not the money, we'll see what the future have for us in terms of cars, I guess that autonomous cars will be taking over in 5-6 years.
youtube AI Harm Incident 2018-01-09T12:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilityai_itself
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policynone
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgzmTWvkx_16kZxRipB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwU3JKTd7DXea630ch4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy5Al8HpdWeQXVA14V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzR-I1zg7Fd24xkO2B4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyTRsoOWGCfnwZIeM14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyLGAxBlRBrU6Q9HzF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzGRQqzWI3R8ooBq5t4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzTIXhunuFErqKh5k54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgypFlEyseWL_KumX5F4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwMlxjfJsg85RHvnPZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"} ]