Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
In fact, it's much worse... If you shoot a video or photo on an iPhone, it's imm…
ytc_UgwrtLJJN…
G
What artists would get together and post random "arts" that are actually just ra…
ytc_UgzYd_C0e…
G
Thank you Glen! !!
I was so angry to see our President sign an executive order t…
ytc_UgyPCsEfn…
G
The public release date remains under wraps (currently unlisted on YouTube), but…
ytc_Ugyvc_pRa…
G
Ai art is nothing compared to art from a human. It's not original. it's generate…
ytc_UgyYhaz4L…
G
They need to create a low if a robot kills a human being. This is crazy. Why are…
ytc_UgxqebWfp…
G
So who gets the ticket when a cop rolls up lol the A.I or the driver…
ytc_UgzHQDDHF…
G
seeing artists and others come together to absolutely cook the crap out of these…
ytc_Ugx5keQgH…
Comment
The video is fake! Each attentive human driver
driver could have prevented the women's death.
It is simple math:
low beam head lights have a range of at least 150feet (60m).
In addition there is stray light from street lamps. The women has been in the middle of the road when she became visible. This means at a speed of 38mph (17m/s) the time from the women becoming visible to the impact is approximately 3.5s. In the video this duration is just over a second. Car stopping distance including "thinking time used in The Highway Code" at 38mph is 110 feet.
Conclusion:
1. With a human driver, the lady would be alive.
2. The video is manipulated or of such a low quality that it actually hides the most important details.
3. Uber's automated car completely failed and its safety is worse than a human driven car.
We can only speculate if the video has been purposely edited or whether it is just the bad quality; why there is no better video available from such a high tech car;
why the police officer made such a bold statement based on such a weak evidence, blaming the victim.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2018-03-25T12:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxwGXbN23TdgmZG_pR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylSrf2BiYb56w1zHh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwd4sJnL5aa2uTFGFl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjJAlhl41P08qaCUB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz21zp6Sv9W0289naZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]