Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Do you prefer to look at CGI/Special effects or "Ai". Been around for 70 yea…
ytc_UgzNDKkia…
G
this was very hard to listen to... There seems to be a lot of lack of informatio…
ytc_UgyMflifZ…
G
@Gumitto You are not 10x more productive. I just back from my experience of writ…
ytr_UgxjAI4V_…
G
Based on what I’ve seen of co pilot it’s just a dump of predictive code from sta…
ytc_UgxANttAr…
G
Yes, this. Humans will continue to develop - and to deploy - terrible weapons, a…
ytc_UgxebFuLq…
G
Teachers can’t be replaced by AI because though the human brain doesn’t respond …
ytc_UgyWxomhL…
G
Trust the government that's 33 trillion in debt and committed countless unaccoun…
ytc_UgxpQ8HlY…
G
Sad how many involuntary human guinea pigs have been used and had their minds w…
ytc_UgxZrnS9D…
Comment
What would've happened if these guys had simply admitted their mistake at the very start? Something like, "Our sincere apologies. We were using ChatGPT to help identify relevant cases and were ignorant of the fact that it might generate non-existent cases. We acknowledge that were wrong about these cases: they do not exist. We have learned an (embarrassing) lesson about how ChatGPT cannot be used to search for relevant case law and we will not repeat this mistake."
Would the judge have rolled his eyes at them but forgiven them? Would they have to step down from the case? Or would they face sanctions with such an admission of failure?
Without knowing crap about the legal system, my expectation is that they would not be punished beyond being forced to stop representing their client and refund them any fees. It just seems unthinkable that there would be any wisdom in lying about their mistake like they did.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2023-06-10T17:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgzJQ_6XMOxAyJLMsK14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyqBKpiunHzE65NPkx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxlpADF0euSxJkxODl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXUBhwTYMrZ93knQ14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkchEAOCDNCIRsem94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPpfVEOkgdBXY0t1t4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw687qjI9EeJMhUER14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyk8aGxjqdE6AKjNL94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxpwMVN0BSRATxArLZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGGcieCmwscao0Puh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}]